The time for Clinton to argue against the Democratic nominating system was back in 2006-07, when she seemed to be the likely nominee, but before it could possibly look like self-serving manipulation of the established and well-understood rules.
Note: Comments are screened, and in some cases edited, before posting. We reserve the right to reject anything we find objectionable.
Other reader comments on this article
Comment
By
Date
Lets be fair and honest to the process of selecting the democratic nominee, the only true criteria in process is... [MORE]
frank
May 21, 2008 11:58
This is the best assessment that I have read of the current situation in the Democratic Party. Very astute! Thank... [MORE]
Pat Pepper
May 21, 2008 11:48
Clinton has been winning more votes in open primaries because of cross-over Republicans who specifically say they don't even intend... [MORE]
Arthur
May 21, 2008 11:27
Am I missing something? Hillary Clinton ran a bad campaign and now she is getting exactly what her "inevitable" stance... [MORE]
Vincent Redd
May 21, 2008 11:21
The time for Clinton to argue against the Democratic nominating system was back in 2006-07, when she seemed to be...
JOe C
May 21, 2008 11:08
Here is an analogy that I think all football fans can understand regarding Michigan, Florida, and Hillary's "big state" argument.... [MORE]
Quinn
May 21, 2008 11:06
The only way for HRC to claim the popular vote, is to count MI, with no votes going to Obama.... [MORE]
Rich Santoro
May 21, 2008 10:28
As some pundits are rightfully pointing out, Obama's problem seems more geographic than demographic. Stop playing in to her campaign's... [MORE]
Cass
May 21, 2008 10:00
Clinton's focus on who got the most votes does not address the correct question. It's not just Democrats voting in... [MORE]