Stossel is an admirable investigator. The conclusions he reaches in this article are very wrong and sound like a good neo-con's 'trade is everything' cheerleader. Trade is fine, but not the and-all be-all. It is very important that we have the ability to go to energy independence, so that a Russia invading Georgia, and a military response by us, won't result in hamstringing ourselves. It is much, much better to maintain the independence, that continues keeping us a sovereign nation, and not beholden to any other country. Energy is too important to leave to the inane statements of journalists, it seems. John, you are sounding like a globalist with a rainbow for a symbol.
Note: Comments are screened, and in some cases edited, before posting. We reserve the right to reject anything we find objectionable.
Other reader comments on this article
Comment
By
Date
I respect Stossel because he is normally an able defender of libertarian principles and free markets. But in this case... [MORE]
theirisher
Aug 22, 2008 11:32
There are several things being overlooked in Mr. Stossel's article. 1) Unless the oil supply/industry is nationalized, any new oil... [MORE]
NuroSlam
Aug 22, 2008 09:57
Why do so many people lack the ability to recognize common sense? Mr. Stossel is absolutely correct. To think that... [MORE]
micky
Aug 21, 2008 17:07
The problem with your argument, John, is that we have more oil even than the Saudis. We should be able... [MORE]
Josh
Aug 21, 2008 11:59
I am a fan of John Stossel's writing but he misses the mark in his editorial about energy independence. The... [MORE]
edward brandwein
Aug 21, 2008 11:43
Stossel is an admirable investigator. The conclusions he reaches in this article are very wrong and sound like a good...