Recent Blog Posts
How Mike Daisey Can Do More With Your Money
The Bullfight
Head to Head with the White House: New York's Stately Dinner for The New York City Ballet
Submitted by Axl VanJovi, Sep 4, 2008 12:55
Who makes over $200,000 a year anyway? I don't want to punish anyone for their success but ...come on.
Note: Comments are screened, and in some cases edited, before posting. We reserve the right to reject anything we find objectionable.
To JIM, who commented on Aug. 25. You are a condescending individual who is rather out of touch with what... [MORE]
lucia
Sep 18, 2008 14:29
Boy, talk about a stretch to make such a rabid feminist argument. Gotta make everything about feminism nowadays don't we,... [MORE]
Tracie
Sep 5, 2008 11:19
Axl VanJovi
Sep 4, 2008 12:55
I think it's about time that the rich pay their share of taxes. They have had a free ride under... [MORE]
J Vandermeer
Sep 4, 2008 08:56
Any Federal Income Tax that is direct and not apportioned is illegal--period. The 16th amendment does not allow the government... [MORE]
isaiah
Sep 4, 2008 03:42
I agree the article may be stretching the case that the proposed taxes are against women. Why is everyone so... [MORE]
Sharon
Sep 3, 2008 18:46
I guess we have one of those households where we evil ones earn too much. If we have to give... [MORE]
Jim
Aug 25, 2008 16:14
RichardB What deluded planet are you on if you think the top wage earners aren't paying thier fair share. For... [MORE]
Chance Haywood
Aug 20, 2008 23:58
The title of the article is quite misleading. It is quite a stretch of imagination to come to the same... [MORE]
Anthony
Aug 17, 2008 23:44
Everytime the subject of taxes comes up people get all hysterical. Let it be remembered that taxes are what pays... [MORE]
RichardB
Aug 16, 2008 19:10
All tax policies are going to be unfair to someone. The republican attitude has been that if the rich have... [MORE]
John Doe
Aug 16, 2008 14:53
The subject of the article is misleading. "War on women"? More appropriately, we should all be asking what will be... [MORE]
Pamela
Aug 16, 2008 08:49
War on women? Vowing to overturn Roe v. Wade is a war on women. Suggesting that women who make less... [MORE]
TKK
Aug 16, 2008 00:20
I don't know a single person earning more the $100,000 but if I did earn that amount, which means a... [MORE]
RFO
Aug 15, 2008 20:45
What is the real size of the demographic we are talking about? I mean let's be serious, a household combined... [MORE]
Nick Zamonis
Aug 15, 2008 14:46
First, if two people marry and incur higher taxes why is this a penalty only on the woman? Hopefully the... [MORE]
Tim
Aug 15, 2008 14:06
That assessment is a pretty extreme reach. There is no such thing as a second earner, man or woman. There... [MORE]
ff11
Aug 14, 2008 18:48
I dislike the attitude of the commenters here. Basically, you are saying that you don't care if a policy is... [MORE]
Steven
Aug 14, 2008 17:57
We are expecting our second child this winter. I make a good income enough to afford daycare for two children... [MORE]
lisa
Aug 14, 2008 17:47
It makes no difference whatsoever, whatever Obama claims he'll do on taxes before the election, will be out the window... [MORE]
Robert Arvanitis
Aug 14, 2008 17:21
So a couple making almost $400,000 a year will have to pay more taxes? Cry me a river. [MORE]
sefton
Aug 14, 2008 17:19
The hypothetical high wage earning couple can in most cases drastically reduce their exposure to federal and state income taxes... [MORE]
john Shirey
Aug 14, 2008 17:10
Before submitting your comment, please provide a valid email address to complete the verification process.
© 2002-2009 TWO SL LLC, New York, NY. All rights reserved. Use of this site signifies your agreement to the Terms of Service and Privacy Policy.