Michael Shermer has a remarkable ability to take on an idea and flex it like a Rubik's cube to show the different patterns of texture. His provocative articles in Scientific American are a delight to read as they are witty, insightful and well grounded in logic and empirical evidence. He has had to courage to debate such notables as William Dembski and Michael Behe and the out and out guts to confront double-talking charlatans like Kent Hovind, the bible-thumping psuedo-scientist dubbed "Dr. Dino." In this short paper, Michael gives us a synthesis of the issues discussed in his provocative book, Why Darwin matters, in which he provides the layman with a useful viewpoint of the dialectic between those who look for an anthropomorphic source for the origins of the universe and those who do not. As a scientist and anthropologist, who also examines the same questions as Michael, I never miss a chance to read anything he has written Can't say that I agree with him on everything down the line, e.g., he is willing to consider Richard Dawkins's notion of "memes," non-material fragments who contribute to adaptability, which most of my profession eschew, but in substance and focus, his views are balanced, fair and to the point., as are the issues discussed in this article.
Note: Comments are screened, and in some cases edited, before posting. We reserve the right to reject anything we find objectionable.
Other reader comments on this article
Comment
By
Date
Religion and science share a few characteristics that ought to make anyone with a toe-hold in either science or religion... [MORE]
Julius Barber
Nov 8, 2006 18:00
Anyone who has spent any of time talking to folks whose basic language is god-speak knows that there are two... [MORE]
Bob Zimmermann
Nov 4, 2006 19:50
The only reason why humans need a god is the fear of death, which includes the refusal of a definite... [MORE]
Roberto Hollnagel
Nov 4, 2006 16:39
Let's say that we look at our reality with an open mind, not with any agenda. It's a miraculous adventure... [MORE]
cause and effect
Nov 3, 2006 20:55
Intelligent Design usually involves some aspect of life and its development.
I wish to present a fact of chemistry / physics... [MORE]
Ed Bonds
Nov 3, 2006 19:49
Shermer's an interesting character. I'm not sure he's consistently right, but he's got something charming to him, so I listen.... [MORE]
K. Smith
Nov 3, 2006 16:54
This article summarizes consdierable material that is already in print, but does so in an illuminating way. I would only... [MORE]
Stanley Krippner
Nov 3, 2006 12:25
Religion stems from a deep need of people to have the feeling they are being taken care off. The need... [MORE]
Yohanan Brada
Nov 3, 2006 10:54
Michael Shermer has a remarkable ability to take on an idea and flex it like a Rubik's cube to show...
Frank P. Araujo
Nov 3, 2006 10:27
I found the last three paragraphs of this article particularly interesting and, truly, baffling. Shermer assumes that the supernatural equals... [MORE]
Just like always, Dr. Shermer scientifically explains the steps of evolution by scientifically reasoning rather than mythical stories of creation... [MORE]
Sara Smith
Nov 3, 2006 07:51
The three counties south of Cincinnati called northern Kentucky have evolution/creation living side by side. Big Bone Lick State Park,... [MORE]
Mr. Andrew O. Lutes
Nov 3, 2006 07:11
As a strong atheist, anti-theist,I am proud of Dr.Shermer now being a fellow atheist and will read his new book... [MORE]
morgan-lynn lamberth
Nov 3, 2006 06:41
I'm glad that your passionate in your views, but do you really think the agruments proposed by Stenger or Rossown... [MORE]
Michael Geiser
Nov 3, 2006 09:32
As usual, the theists response is that the argument isn't to their liking; therefore there is an error in it.
Simple... [MORE]
Bill Henry
Nov 4, 2006 12:32
Morgan-Lynn Lamberth wrote, "As a strong atheist, anti-theist,I am proud of Dr.Shermer now being a fellow atheist ..."
Dr. Shermer did... [MORE]
George Slusher
Nov 4, 2006 12:34
Bill:
You mistakenly lump me in as a "theist". And what's with you going all "Ad Hominem" on me there Kemo... [MORE]
Michael Geiser
Nov 6, 2006 15:20
Don't know why you thought my response was aimed at you. I suspect I accidently checked a box or something.
I... [MORE]
Bill Henry
Nov 6, 2006 17:06
Michael, choose all possble attributes , only to find that none work!Stenger is so right after all.One has to make... [MORE]
Morgan-Lynn Lamberth
Jan 31, 2007 19:52
The trouble I still have is in the logical consistancy of the argurement and not the passions behind them.
From your... [MORE]
Michael Geiser
Feb 1, 2007 12:36
An excellent article, with some pithy observations, but one major error: Richard Dawkins' TV show was on Channel 4, not... [MORE]