I believe that the distinction you make between John Adams and the current defenders of the terrorists is wrong. By way of example, when Nazi saboteurs invaded the U.S. in 1942, President Roosevelt appointed Col. Kenneth C. Royall to defend them in secret military tribunals. Notwithstanding Roosevelt's orders to stay away from civilian courts (and get on with the executions), Royall took his mandate seriously and appealed to the U.S. Supreme Court on behalf of his clients. The Supreme Court let the secret tribunals proceed (a pre-cursor to Guantanamo) and ultimately six of the eight saboteurs were executed. In true Adams fashion, Royall became a Brigadier General and Truman appointed him as Secretary of War. Today's pro bono lawyers serve in the fine tradition of Adams and Royall.
Note: Comments are screened, and in some cases edited, before posting. We reserve the right to reject anything we find objectionable.
Other reader comments on this article
Comment
By
Date
Please answer: How do you know anyone there is a terrorist? How do you figure in the payment of substantial... [MORE]
Daniel Moylan
Jan 19, 2007 17:49
In naming these "terrorists", we must remember what exactly we are saying here. The basic definition would break down to... [MORE]
Cody Jaster
Jan 19, 2007 03:00
The decision between Law and Fashion is clear in today's America. Everybody wants to be on Oprah including the "white-shoe"... [MORE]
JAMES STEPAN
Jan 18, 2007 21:27
I believe that the distinction you make between John Adams and the current defenders of the terrorists is wrong. By...
Richard Raysman
Jan 18, 2007 15:36
I know those sanctimonius lawyers. They earn $150,000 + before they are even 30 years old, while poor men and... [MORE]
Litigator
Jan 18, 2007 11:05
The captured Israeli soldier has nothing to do with the legal proceedings at Guantanamo. If you're trying to show us... [MORE]
gregdn
Jan 18, 2007 09:44
You call the detainees "terrorist enemy prisoners in wartime". Therein lies the problem. What you and your ilk seem to... [MORE]