CONTACT US

Recent Blog Posts

Clinton's Iowa Loss

Editorial of The New York Sun | January 4, 2008

The Iowa caucus-goers had hardly made it back to their farms before the left-wing political pundits were trying to blame Senator Clinton's loss there on her more hawkish foreign policy views. By voting to join the Battle of Iraq and leaving the door open to a continued American troop presence there, by voting for tougher economic sanctions on Iran, and by refusing to meet without preconditions with the leaders of Iran, Cuba, and North Korea, this argument goes, Mrs. Clinton opened herself up to attacks from Senators Edwards and Obama, who accused Mrs. Clinton of giving President Bush a blank check for a new war in Iran and who promised a quicker withdrawal from Iraq than she did.

Don't believe it. On domestic issues, particularly health care, Senator Clinton has actually been running to the left of Senator Obama, boasting that his health care plan isn't truly universal, while hers is. Mr. Obama, meanwhile, has been portraying himself as a post-partisan consensus builder, "a leader who will bring us together," as his closing television commercial in Iowa put it, in implicit contrast to Mrs. Clinton.

On foreign policy, Mrs. Clinton moved, as the caucuses approached, so far to the left that her positions were practically indistinguishable from those of Mr. Obama. On Iraq, she sponsored legislation calling for a 120-day timeline for withdrawing American troops. She is also trying, with Senator Byrd, to repeal the 2002 congressional resolution that authorized the war. On Iran, she co-sponsored Senator Webb's bill attempting to forbid the president from taking military action against Iran without first getting permission from Congress, and she issued a statement claiming she has "been concerned for a long time over George Bush's saber rattling and belligerence toward Iran." She also says her administration would talk to the government in Tehran.

If anything, Mrs. Clinton suffered on foreign policy not from a perception that she was a hawk or a dove but from the perception that she stood for no principle other than getting herself elected. The Democratic nominating process is a long way from over, and as Iowa goes isn't necessarily how the nation goes. But if Mrs. Clinton can figure out a way to recover from her loss in the cornfields, well, it'll be a feat worthy of a presidential nominee.


Reader comments on this article

Comment By Date

Your views are absolutely correct.. The Clintons stand for nothing. When running for the Senate in 2000, she promised Western... [MORE]

Dan Ridgway 

Jan 3, 2008 23:58

Hillary Clinton's supporters see her election as somehow good for women. During her eight years in the White House did... [MORE]

Bill Dienstag 

Jan 4, 2008 10:07

I agree with Mr. Ridway and his comments ,however I would like to point out to him Shillary was born... [MORE]

Rogers Marshall 

Jan 4, 2008 10:23

Kudos to Iowa voters for discerning all along what a fraud Hillary is -- by being all things to all... [MORE]

chris vaz 

Jan 4, 2008 17:38

You have to be different. Period. With a war that half the country hates...a good economy that gets bad reviews, a... [MORE]

Filler 

Jan 4, 2008 00:21

You write'as fact: "On foreign policy, Mrs. Clinton, as the caucuses approached, so far to the left that her positions... [MORE]

TimothyL 

Jan 4, 2008 08:30

i agree with timothyl. look at principles. mike huckabee is the clear choice for president. [MORE]

matthew a 

Jan 4, 2008 13:36

It should be obvious to all except the brain dead that the Clinton clan will say anything to get elected.They... [MORE]

fcsanders 

Jan 4, 2008 12:49

She wants us to believe that because she had spent 8 years next to her dishonset husband she is therefore... [MORE]

Thomas 

Jan 5, 2008 09:34

Up until last night I had resigned myself to the fact that Hillary's nomination was inevitable; that somehow the mainstream... [MORE]

Richard Meade 

Jan 4, 2008 14:16

The sentence "The Iowa caucus-goers had hardly made it back to their farms... (New York Sun "Clinton's Iowa Loss")" is... [MORE]

Jacob Trunnell 

Jan 4, 2008 19:08

71% of those who could vote for Hilary-DIDN'T. Maybe, even the left can no longer abide the lies, hold their... [MORE]

chuck higgins 

Jan 5, 2008 12:15

"....to put Chinese warheads into orbit," "part jewish" (capitalization error is yours). I will not discuss my concerns with Ms. Clinton's... [MORE]

John House 

Jan 6, 2008 12:33