Recent Blog Posts

Ancient Document Confirms Existence Of Biblical Figure

By NIGEL REYNOLDS, The Daily Telegraph | July 11, 2007

LONDON — The sound of unbridled joy seldom breaks the quiet of the British Museum's great Arched Room, which holds its collection of 130,000 Assyrian cuneiform tablets, dating back 5,000 years.

But Michael Jursa, a visiting professor from Vienna, let out such a cry last Thursday. He had made what has been called the most important find in biblical archaeology for 100 years, a discovery that supports the view that the historical books of the Bible are based on fact.

Searching for Babylonian financial accounts among the tablets, Jursa suddenly came across a name that he half remembered — Nabusharrussu-ukin, described there in 2,500-year-old writing as "the chief eunuch" of Nebuchadnezzar II, king of Babylon.

Mr. Jursa, an Assyriologist, checked Chapter 39 of the Book of Jeremiah, and he found, spelled differently, the same name — Nebo-Sarsekim. Nebo-Sarsekim, according to Jeremiah, was Nebuchadnezzar II's "chief officer" and was with him at the siege of Jerusalem in the year 587 before the common era, when the Babylonians overran the city.

The small tablet, the size of "a packet of 10 cigarettes" according to Irving Finkel, a British Museum expert, is a bill of receipt acknowledging Nabu-sharrussuukin's payment of 0.75 kg of gold to a temple in Babylon.

The tablet is dated to the 10th year of the reign of Nebuchadnezzar II, 595 B.C.E., 12 years before the siege of Jerusalem.

Evidence from non-biblical sources of people named in the Bible is not unknown, but Nabusharrussu-ukin would have been a relatively insignificant figure. "This is a fantastic discovery, a world-class find," Mr. Finkel said yesterday. "If Nebo-Sarsekim existed, which other lesser figures in the Old Testament existed? A throwaway detail in the Old Testament turns out to be accurate and true. I think that it means that the whole of the narrative [of Jeremiah] takes on a new kind of power."


Reader comments on this article

Comment By Date

I'm a firm believer of the historical facts of the Bible, including the Old Testament, an apologist who rejoices every... [MORE]

Mrs. AliceMae Favro 

Jul 11, 2007 06:50

It is of no surprise that once again archaeology proves the Bible to be true. Try that with the book... [MORE]

Jim Jessee 

Jul 11, 2007 11:25

As the "experts" continue studies of the ancent writings they will find more and more proofs that the bible is... [MORE]

Joe Huber 

Jul 18, 2007 20:11

Makes sense to me. I think it is quite logical to conclude that if the Bible is indeed true, as... [MORE]

Matthew Halsted 

Jul 11, 2007 23:29

I was very thrilled to read the recent (of many) "discoveries" which confirm the Holy Scripture's historical and revelatory truthfulness.... [MORE]

Nathan Bickel; 

Jul 12, 2007 03:53

What Nathan Bickel said is true- of those that should be pursuaded, few are. There is much evidence on God's existence;... [MORE]

Wanderer 

Sep 2, 2007 06:00

Judiasm and Christianity are historical religions meaning that they aren't based on a mystical belief wholly unrelated to history. Faith... [MORE]

Gary Brown 

Jul 12, 2007 10:42

God never ceases to amaze me. He reveals His truth and power using the small thing, the insignificant thing and... [MORE]

Charlie Wood 

Jul 18, 2007 16:03

How interesting that the bible is accurate even in its details. Reminds me of the obscure word in I Sam.... [MORE]

Jim Luther 

Jul 19, 2007 16:23

A great find!!! But I don't get this Finkel guy. If he is such an 'expert' at the British museum, why... [MORE]

Vern 

Jul 22, 2007 11:23