Recent Editorials


receive the latest by email:
subscribe to the new york sun's free mailing list

Reader comments on this article

Read all comments

Comment By Date

Bill Clinton's Justice Dept., in 1998, tied Al Qaeda and Iraq to weapon's development in Iraq (in the Osama Bin... [MORE]

Victor T

Mar 14, 2008 07:28

Enough said.. the war has cost America our economic fortitude, and Bush is the cause. [MORE]

Jason

Mar 14, 2008 20:10

Hamas, Islamic Jiihad, the Muslim Brotherhood, Al Qaeda, all birds of a feather wanting America dead. All these groups are... [MORE]

Pat Kean

Mar 15, 2008 04:10

At well under 1% of ALL gov expenses, only the foolish would believe this leg of the terror wars is... [MORE]

Stu

Mar 15, 2008 08:28

The Duefler Report also found Iran, which Israel has maintained is the true threat in the Middle East, was the... [MORE]

knick49

Mar 15, 2008 17:43

Knick49 leaves out some other facts: In a single move, yes, we took out Saddam (the weakest threat) but also dealt... [MORE]

Victor T

Mar 18, 2008 06:58

The war has been very, very costly. Agreed. But America decided to go in. Seventy percent of Americans and most... [MORE]

Victor T

Mar 18, 2008 10:28

Excellent post by Pat Kean. [MORE]

Victor T

Mar 18, 2008 10:30

Why is it the liberals only complain about the cost of the war on terror? I don't hear them complaining... [MORE]

KO

Mar 18, 2008 12:32

Terrorist are at war with The West because terrorist believe Islam can not survive against a free market, free speech... [MORE]

Getzel

Mar 14, 2008 08:41

No matter how much info is released. People who hate Bush will never believe that he made the right move... [MORE]

larry

Mar 14, 2008 11:06

The missing context: how did the threat of Saddam compare with the other threats we faced? The report proves Saddam... [MORE]

Richard Nixon

Mar 16, 2008 04:37

"Emily Litella's" classic comment when presented with facts that eviscerate her tirade on Saturday Nite Live! shows applies here to... [MORE]

Bill Heller

Mar 14, 2008 11:21

There may not have been a direct OPERATIONAL link between Saddam and al Quiada, but there were certainly ties, support... [MORE]

Kirt

Mar 15, 2008 09:23

Unfortunantely, I just heard a local radio host, in St. Louis, claim that there was "no direct tie between Saddam... [MORE]

Don

Mar 14, 2008 12:27

Well, why do you think they call it "National Partisan Radio"......? Your tax dollars hard at work! [MORE]

Nor Meyer

Mar 14, 2008 13:11

There was no "direct link" aka a treaty/agreement/understanding between Saddam and AQ. Saddam had no links to the 9/11 attack,... [MORE]

Steven

Mar 14, 2008 13:34

The Pentagon report makes it clear that Saddam had ties to terrorists, but none to Al Qaeda as the Bush... [MORE]

Boom

Mar 14, 2008 17:04

The Pentagon report makes it clear that Saddam had ties to terrorists, but none to Al Qaeda as the Bush... [MORE]

Shayne

Mar 14, 2008 20:18

No matter how you try to color it, the fact that Al Qaeda had tining camps in IRAQ while Hussein... [MORE]

KB

Mar 15, 2008 08:01

You wouldn't believe it if it came up and bit you in the rear end! You simply hate Bush so... [MORE]

LB

Mar 15, 2008 17:50

Saying there is no connection between Saddam and 9/11, is very different from saying Saddam had ties with Al Qaeda... [MORE]

RandR

Mar 17, 2008 11:42

Years after the first Iraq war and not long after the arms inspectors were asked to leave Iraq, a story... [MORE]

Jack Avery

Mar 14, 2008 21:06

I no longer argue this whole point. The "hate-Bush" crowd that didn't seem to utter one peep when Clinton pimped... [MORE]

Scott

Mar 14, 2008 21:38

If you are really a "liberal", which among other things means, "open minded" and suject ot change views, then dare... [MORE]

J. Alejandro

Mar 15, 2008 08:16

Comment on this article

Name
Email Address
Title of Comments
Comments:

Note: Comments are reviewed and, in some cases, edited before posting. Not all comments are posted. Chances of a comment being posted are increased if the comment is polite, accurate, grammatical, and substantive or newsworthy. The Sun does not accept comments referring to individuals by only their first names or by nicknames and in the case of most public officials requires, on first reference, a title, such as President Obama or Secretary Clinton. Second references to individuals and public officials require in most cases an honorific, such as Mr. Obama or Mrs. Clinton. Comments adhering to these style points stand a better chance of being posted.

Would You Like to Become a Sustaining Subscriber of the Sun? Sign up now

* Inquire about the Sun Seminars

Sustaining Subscriber Login

Follow The New York Sun

Facebook    Twitter    RSS    Join Mailing List