Recent Blog Posts

Hagel Warns of Impeachment of President

Republican Threatens To Work With Democrats on Anti-War Bill
By ELI LAKE, Staff Reporter of the Sun | March 26, 2007

WASHINGTON — Senator Hagel, a Republican of Nebraska who is predicting that President Bush will face calls for impeachment if he ignores Congress on the war, will introduce binding legislation this week to begin the withdrawal of soldiers from Iraq.

Speaking on ABC's "This Week," Mr. Hagel said he would introduce a binding resolution this week "focused on redeployment, training and equipment." Mr. Hagel's co-sponsor for the new Iraq resolution is Senator Webb, a Democrat of Virginia who has introduced legislation in the Senate to prevent the president from taking any military action against Iran and who won his election to his first term in the Senate last November by running on an anti-war platform. Mr. Webb, who served in the Reagan administration as the secretary of the Navy, has emerged as a favorite of the Democratic online group, MoveOn.org.

Mr. Hagel's pending resolution on Iraq puts him at odds with his party, which has won back many of the Republicans who in December began raising doubts about the war. On Friday, the House Democrats received only two Republican votes for a supplemental budget bill that would mandate a withdrawal of forces from Iraq by 2008. Eight days before, Senator Gordon Smith of Oregon was the only Republican who voted for the binding resolution sponsored by Senator Reid, the majority leader, mandating a timetable for withdrawal. Mr. Hagel voted with his party against that resolution.

However, Mr. Hagel yesterday indicated his days of voicing skepticism about the war but voting with the president had ended. "I will not accept the status quo, I will not continue to support with my vote the current policy," he said.

He went further in an interview with the April issue of Esquire magazine. "He's not accountable anymore, which isn't totally true. You can impeach him, and before this is over, you might see calls for his impeachment. I don't know. It depends on how this goes," he said in that interview.

When asked yesterday on ABC what he meant by his comments to the magazine about impeachment, the senator said, "Any president who says, ‘I don't care,' or ‘I will not respond to what the people of this country are saying about Iraq or anything else,' or ‘I don't care what the Congress does, I am going to proceed' — if a president really believes that, then there are —what I was pointing out, there are ways to deal with that."

Yesterday a senior Senate staffer close to the Senate Republican leader said he did not expect Mr. Hagel would vote for a timetable for withdrawal, despite his comments.

"He was with us last time," this source wrote in an e-mail. "He doesn't like arbitrary withdrawals, and he doesn't want to prevent the funding bill from getting through. The Reid language is a poison pill."

A former communications director for the Republican National Committee, Clifford May, yesterday said he was disappointed in Mr. Hagel. "That's really disappointing and really rather sad to hear a U.S. senator threaten the president with impeachment for attempting to do his job as commander in chief," said Mr. May, now president of the Foundation for the Defense of Democracies. "Senator Hagel voted to confirm General Petraeus as the commander in Iraq. He should not have done so if he was planning to undermine General Petraeus' mission."

Mr. Hagel yesterday said he was particularly angry about the president's reaction to the House passage of the Iraq supplemental budget, which the president said in his radio address this weekend he would veto if it crossed his desk. That bill gives the White House $24 billion more than it asked for to fund the troop surge in Baghdad and Anbar, but it also mandates a timeline and a cut off of war funding after August 31, 2008.

The president on Saturday in his national radio address warned that if Congress does not appropriate the funds for the military by April 15 in a clean bill, then the military's mission in Afghanistan and Iraq could face disruptions.

"By choosing to make a political statement and passing a bill they know will never become law, the Democrats in Congress have only delayed the delivery of the vital funds and resources our troops need," Mr. Bush said. "The clock is running."


Reader comments on this article

Comment By Date

"That bill gives the White House $24 billion more than it asked for to fund... [MORE]

ACD 

Mar 26, 2007 12:01

He's contracted Cindy Sheehan Disease. [MORE]

RufusLeeKing 

Mar 26, 2007 12:33

Hagel gets credibility on "Republican" issues because of his affiliation. But when a senator of the same party as the... [MORE]

rick geiger 

Mar 26, 2007 13:49

Bush needs to be stopped and he will not listen to the populace so what else do we need to... [MORE]

Frank 

Mar 26, 2007 20:22

I think Hagel is an honorable American and unlike so many hawks, actually served in a war. I think that... [MORE]

William Smith 

Mar 26, 2007 22:03

Is manufactuing false intellegence to justify war not treason? Is failure to defend the Constitution not impeachable? When a president ignores the... [MORE]

Tom Hughes 

Mar 26, 2007 23:01

Frank: With respect, I don't understand your comments and ask you to expand. You didn't sleep? Why not? President Bush... [MORE]

D Smith 

Mar 29, 2007 04:06

Mr Hughes: I'm willing to ignore your errors in syntax and spelling ("breaches of Constitutional breaches"), but cannot ignore unsubstantiated... [MORE]

D Smith 

Mar 29, 2007 04:38

When are you and every member of your family that is of legal draft age enlisting?????????? [MORE]

Rufus is Where? 

Mar 26, 2007 15:43

throw him his 30 pieces of silver & tell him 2 go out & play with the democrat .hope he... [MORE]

john labombard 

Mar 26, 2007 16:30

It is amazing how many armchair generals we have in the private citizen sector that are so much more knowlegeable... [MORE]

J. Emerson 

Mar 27, 2007 04:36

Hagel is a big mouth turn coat. He has no allegiance other than to himself. He's far from being a... [MORE]

billclintoon 

Mar 28, 2007 05:32

I doubt anyone could run for President without finding a few people supporting them. j. emerson may support whom he... [MORE]

Gordon Crump 

Mar 28, 2007 11:43

It worries me that people who knowingly tell an untruth just to win votes or feed their hate of a... [MORE]

Shirley E Maunz 

Apr 4, 2007 00:42

There is an organization seeking to run a 3rd party ticket that will reduce party polarization. How do Webb and... [MORE]

Jim Cain 

Mar 26, 2007 17:29

Impeachment of a president is, or ought to be, a gravely serious matter in our system of government. It is... [MORE]

David Weisberg 

Mar 26, 2007 18:52

Amen David Weisberg. We elect the President to LEAD the country without regard to popularity. The President is not a... [MORE]

D Smith 

Mar 29, 2007 03:51

Bush should have been impeached long ago. He lied us into a war with a country that didn't attack us,... [MORE]

Orville H. Larson 

Mar 26, 2007 19:26

You are trying to criminalize political differences. [MORE]

Cyrus Bear 

Apr 3, 2007 23:26

So, in Hagels view, ignoring Congress falls under which of the impeachable offenses, treason, bribery, or other high crimes and... [MORE]

C Foster 

Mar 26, 2007 20:25

The invasion and occupation of Iraq was a crime.  It was a violation of international Law.  This is a simple... [MORE]

mehdi oummih 

Mar 27, 2007 00:36

Bravo. I share your sentiments, and hope that as Americans realize what is going on, they will act with their... [MORE]

Rosie williams 

Mar 31, 2007 20:54

I agree with you mehdi. The war on Iraq was a big mistake and a big crime. It has caused... [MORE]

KM 

Jul 19, 2007 15:54

Much of the disaster that has gripped our country can be traced back to ignoring our own constitution and laws.... [MORE]

mehdi 

Nov 20, 2007 11:31