CONTACT US   PREMIUM

Hand Gel Insufficient, Study Shows

By Associated Press | January 30, 2008

OMAHA, Neb. — Doctors and nurses on the go often skip soap and water in favor of an alcohol-based hand gel, thinking the quick-acting goo will kill bacteria and curb the spread of infection.

It turns out that's not enough. A study appearing in the January issue of Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology found that in a Nebraska hospital, medical employees nearly doubled their use of the alcohol-based gel, but their generally cleaner hands had no bearing on the rate of infections among patients.

An infectious disease specialist at the University of Nebraska Medical Center, Dr. Mark Rupp, who led the study pointed to many villains: Rings and fingernails that are too long and hard to clean, poor handling of catheters, and treatment areas that aren't sanitized. "There are many factors that influence the development of hospital-acquired infections. It would be naive to think that a single, simple intervention would fix this problem," Dr. Rupp said.

The results appear to contradict guidelines from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.


NEW YORK ›

September 11 Health Bill Stalls; One Backer Blames City Hall

Low-Price Laptops Tested at City Schools

New Policy Is Sought in Albany After Report on Silver's Travel

Bed Bug Boom Is a Boost To One Sector

Solons Busy Outside Office, New Income Report Shows

Atlantic Yard Project Suffers a Setback

NATIONAL ›

Feingold Bill Would Limit Searches of Travelers' Laptops

Palin, McCain Decry 'Gotcha' Journalism

Gates Calls for a Balanced Military

Dispute Over Witness Disrupts Stevens Trial

Heart Patients Need Screening For Depression

Little Progress Made in Effort To Restore Everglades

ARTS+ ›

New York Film Festival Goes Around the World and Back

A British Artist Plumbs the Politics of Hunger

Barbet Schroeder Can't Be Killed

'Choke': Hard To Swallow

'Eagle Eye': Let It Go to Voicemail

'The Lucky Ones': Nothing Salves the Soul Like a Road Trip