CONTACT US   PREMIUM

Supreme Court Refuses To Hear Port Chester Property Case

By Associated Press | January 17, 2007

WASHINGTON — The Supreme Court yesterday refused to consider a property rights case involving a redevelopment project in Westchester County, where businesses are fighting local government efforts to take their land.

The businesses say the village of Port Chester, filed a condemnation petition to acquire their property the day after they rejected what they said was a demand by the project developer for $800,000.

The developer allegedly was demanding the money or a 50% interest in the business people's own project to put a CVS Pharmacy on the site.

In response to the action by Port Chester, property owner Bart Didden and his partners sued, saying the condemnation was purely for private financial gain and not for a public purpose.

A federal judge and the 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals say the property owners waited too long to complain in court.

Port Chester and the developer agreed to the redevelopment in 1999 and Mr. Didden and his partners waited three years to file a legal challenge, lawyers for the village and developer say.


NEW YORK ›

September 11 Health Bill Stalls; One Backer Blames City Hall

Low-Price Laptops Tested at City Schools

New Policy Is Sought in Albany After Report on Silver's Travel

Bed Bug Boom Is a Boost To One Sector

Solons Busy Outside Office, New Income Report Shows

Atlantic Yard Project Suffers a Setback

NATIONAL ›

Feingold Bill Would Limit Searches of Travelers' Laptops

Palin, McCain Decry 'Gotcha' Journalism

Gates Calls for a Balanced Military

Dispute Over Witness Disrupts Stevens Trial

Heart Patients Need Screening For Depression

Little Progress Made in Effort To Restore Everglades

ARTS+ ›

New York Film Festival Goes Around the World and Back

A British Artist Plumbs the Politics of Hunger

Barbet Schroeder Can't Be Killed

'Choke': Hard To Swallow

'Eagle Eye': Let It Go to Voicemail

'The Lucky Ones': Nothing Salves the Soul Like a Road Trip