Recent Blog Posts

Jews and Wasps

By WALTER RUSSELL MEAD | November 16, 2007

"I say there are two sides in the struggle:" wrote Osama bin Laden in one of the bombastic manifestoes that have so signally failed to unite the Islamic masses under his leadership. "One side is the global Crusader alliance with the Zionist Jews, led by America, Britain and Israel, and the other side is the Islamic world." President Ahmadinejad sees it the same way: America, Britain, and Israel are out to destroy everything that gives meaning and decency to the world.

This isn't just about power. The United States, says bin Laden, has "the worst civilization witnessed in the history of mankind." Greedy, licentious, exploitative — we are a danger to man and an offense to God. The Syrian parliamentarian and critic of Hollywood culture Muhammad Habash describes the "project" of American culture to "crush the weak, oppress the weak, crush them, climb all over their corpses."

On this point, our enemies are less original than they suppose. A common hatred of Britain, America, Jews, and liberal capitalist modernity emerged in the 19th century and played a major role in the history and culture of the last 100 years.

Today's anti-Americans, anti-Semites, and anti-Zionists — whether they are ex-Marxists, thuggish populists like many supporters of Venezuela's Hugo Chavez or fanatical jihadis holed up in Waziristan — have embraced a set of images and beliefs that haunted the European imagination for hundreds of years.

This hatred is the product of the great story of modern world history: the rise of a global system of power, commerce, finance, culture, and ideology resting first on the power of Britain and now on that of America. As horrified Spanish, French, German, Japanese, and Soviets looked on, since 1688 the British have been on the winning side in every great power conflict in which they have fought — with the single exception of the American Revolution. In other words, the two great English speaking powers have either separately or together won every major war since the 17th century, and the global system resting on their military and commercial prowess remains the foundation of international order today.

Those who have fought and opposed this system attacked both its geopolitical ambitions and its ideological foundations. Where the Anglophones considered themselves to be fighting for freedom and tolerance, their enemies saw an economic and social system based on exploitation, greed, and a ruthless will to power. European suspicion of the allegedly harsh and inhuman character of the dreaded "Anglo-Saxon" model of capitalism echoes these concerns.

Jews and Wasps have their differences, but the rest of the world saw us as fighting on the same side long before America's support of Israel became a major world issue. French Jacobins attacked Britain as "Carthage" — a cruel, commercial, maritime, and Semitic empire that opposed the noble agrarian Latin world. By the Dreyfus controversy, French anti-Semites increasingly saw specific linkages between the supposedly rootless and cosmopolitan Jew and the terrifying Anglo-American economic machine.

Throughout Europe the Boer War was seen as evidence that Jewish plutocrats secretly manipulated British politicians to launch a war against virtuous farmers to protect Jewish interests in South African gold. "Oncle Sam" became "Oncle Shylock" in French nationalist propaganda during the 1930s. Fascist leaders attacked both Churchill and Roosevelt as tools of the Jews, pointing to the significant presence of Jews among their closest advisors and friends. Stalinists shared both the hatred of liberalism and the identification of liberal capitalism with evil, cosmopolitan, and unmistakably Jewish values. As the Soviet apologist Genrikh Volkov put it, American capitalism reflected a "Shylock passion to utilize for the sake of profit not only a man's blood but also the living soul and his beating heart." The critics have seen something real. Despite a steady undercurrent of anti-Semitism, both Britain and America have long histories of tolerance and more than tolerance for Jews. From the time of Oliver Cromwell, when medieval laws against Jews began to lapse, Jewish immigrants played a growing role in the commercial and cultural life of the English speaking world. Benjamin Disraeli's father received an honorary degree from Oxford in tribute to his scholarly achievements. Disraeli himself, though baptized a Christian, was openly proud of his Jewish heritage even as he headed the ultra-traditionalist Tory Party.

Other European courts tolerated wealthy "court Jews" as financiers. Disraeli was seen as the ideological heir of Edmund Burke and helped construct an ideology of English identity that remains strong today. In the 20th century, men like Isaiah Berlin and Milton Friedman were leading influences in the development of "Anglo-Saxon" political and economic liberalism.

Where critics see a conspiracy, I see a confluence. On the one hand, as Max Weber observed, Judaism like Protestantism provides a solid foundation for success at capitalist enterprise. On the other, it turns out that cultural and religious tolerance are necessary qualities for capitalist success.

Capitalism requires careers that are open to talent: successful investment banks need to be run by the best brains rather than the best pedigrees. At the same time, capitalism produces social change. Competition leads companies to invest in new technologies. Great social cataclysms like the industrial and information revolutions change the way people live. Urbanization uproots farmers and peasants in the tens and ultimately hundreds of millions and sends them into alien new cities. Within and across national frontiers, vast migrations of people course across the landscape.

Some cultures, some societies, tolerate this kind of diversity and upheaval better than others. Jewish society, with a culture shaped by millennia of exile, encountered capitalist modernity with the ability to maintain a sense of identity and continuity in the face of change and has generally adapted well to the new conditions.

Wasps, with cultural roots in a form of Protestant Christianity that is individualistic and future-oriented, have also managed to negotiate the challenges of liberal modernity relatively smoothly. For different reasons, we are at home in the same kind of world, and the "Anglo-Judaic" synthesis remains the despair of our enemies.

Mr. Mead, author of "God and Gold: Britain, America, and the Making of the Modern World," which was just released, is a senior fellow at the Council on Foreign Relations.


Reader comments on this article

Read all comments

Comment By Date

Since the establishment of the Hydraulic Civilizations of ancient Mesopotamia, the Ruling Strata of Civilized Society have utilized the Society's... [MORE]

Cloaude Bogardus 

Nov 16, 2007 09:44

Will China, the next great rival to Anglo-American-Canadian-ANZAK exceptionalism, recognize a distinction between Jews and Christians, the way the Europeans... [MORE]

G. Clarke 

Nov 16, 2007 12:04

Right now, we have two major problems: 1) The intolerant are intolerant of tolerance. 2) The tolerant are tolerant of intolerance. As an... [MORE]

Dr. Ellen 

Nov 16, 2007 13:28

The author is incorrect about the Brits losing only one war since 1688. They did lose in two wars with... [MORE]

Michol 

Nov 16, 2007 16:18

It should be noted that the main British strategy in 1814 was to gain as much land south even to... [MORE]

Dr. Thomas C. LaMar 

Jan 30, 2008 22:32

Your point is true, though banal, but your history is hopelessly muddled. In the late 19th Century, the world was perfectly... [MORE]

Kip Watson 

Nov 16, 2007 17:02

Yours does. Because where it isn't simplified to the point of absurdity, it's just plain flat-out wrong. Where do you think... [MORE]

Slappy Joe 

Nov 16, 2007 21:31

"the world was perfectly justified to fear and resent British and European imperialism"... Having read much of the history of these... [MORE]

dan 

Nov 16, 2007 22:53

The French continuation of the Classical Liberal movement in political economy in fact began its own abnegation. It is a... [MORE]

Tom Perkins 

Nov 18, 2007 02:50

Saying the natives were lucky to be ruled by Britain for a reasonable length of time takes a fairly long... [MORE]

Patrick Kennedy 

Feb 17, 2008 13:16

Mr. Mead comes off as Churchill without the charm here - his 'Anglo-Judaic synthesis' sounds like something that might emerge... [MORE]

Patrick Kennedy 

Nov 16, 2007 17:13

"And as for the bragging about Britain and America's success in war, let's just say you guys chose your friends... [MORE]

dan 

Nov 16, 2007 23:03

"Major land powers? Not so much on your own. Napoleon and Hitler both came a cropper in Russia - without... [MORE]

Tom Perkins 

Nov 18, 2007 02:51

Sorry Patrick, Stalin only fought a single front war. We had to fight on 3 fronts. Europe, Africa and the Pacific.... [MORE]

Dennis D 

Nov 19, 2007 07:24

Nukes would have worked, but not American armies. The notions of personal liberty that made America rich and technologically advanced have... [MORE]

Patrick Kennedy 

Feb 17, 2008 12:43

When it came to the actual fighting, WWII was a war between Germany and her allies and Russia and her... [MORE]

Patrick Kennedy 

Feb 17, 2008 12:54

On second thought, without Stalin they would never have got ashore. Sea Lion would proceeded to conclusion in 1941. The big... [MORE]

Patrick Kennedy 

Feb 17, 2008 15:34

Ever since I was a kid , terrorist have been attacking us and ALWAYS have said it was because of... [MORE]

Dale Legan 

Nov 17, 2007 14:01

It is quiet interesting to see how ideas are borrowed, within the world of research and outside. Within the world of... [MORE]

lilian 

Nov 17, 2007 16:04

Let us reflect on the beginning. We have explorers that date back to the 1500's. We have the Moors and... [MORE]

Anne-Marie Arthur-Askling 

Nov 20, 2007 10:08

If Osama Bin Laden and the Iranian leader were wrong about our morality, we could complain about it; but if... [MORE]

Marie Devine 

Nov 20, 2007 12:49

who says public education failed? reading some of the comments here show that our educational system succeeded completely, if you... [MORE]

warren bacon 

Nov 25, 2007 15:07

I am unable to fathom what is in the mind of the author. He forgets that most wars that were... [MORE]

subramaniam shankar 

Nov 21, 2007 10:43

The other conjecture that Walter Mead failed to mention that binds the two cultures together is that they've both been... [MORE]

Drumond 

Nov 23, 2007 05:48

One explanation for apparent Anglo-Jewish symbiosis may be that lower levels of ethnocentrism among the British and Americans have made... [MORE]

James Russell 

Dec 5, 2007 05:16