Recent Blog Posts

It's Time for Nets To Pull the Trigger on the Big Trade

By JOHN HOLLINGER | July 27, 2007

Jason Kidd is 34. Vince Carter is 30. Richard Jefferson is 27.

In a nutshell, what that should tell you is that it's no time for the Nets to be thinking about the future. With the three best players rapidly approaching their sell-by dates, this team's window is shutting fast.

In turn, those facts should tell you that the Nets' off-season is far from over. Yes, they're pretty much done in free agency, because the signing of Jamaal Magloire (ugh) has put them at the luxury tax limit. In fact, the only move left is to re-sign Eddie House or bring in another combo guard of his ilk, just as soon as they can dispose of Mile Ilic's contract (geez, they sure soured on him fast, huh?).

But the Nets can't possibly bring this group back next year with a straight face … right? Especially after the non-events of last summer led directly to last season's disappointment. Standing pat would pretty much be a one-way street to 43–39, and while that kind of mark would make the Knicks ecstatic, the Nets are at a very different point in their history. With perhaps a two-year opening for the Kidd-Carter-Jefferson combo to re-climb the Eastern Conference mountain, the Nets need to be pulling out all the stops to get them the necessary help.

And pulling out the stops, in this case, means making a trade. If you accept that standing pat is not a realistic option, then team president Rod Thorn should be burning up the phone lines this August trying to get the final piece of the puzzle. Fortunately, he has a few assets to work with. Chief among them is Jefferson, who likely would be the centerpiece of any trade proposal because he's the youngest of the three. He also makes a lot of money, which is actually helpful — it allows the Nets to match contracts in a trade so that it meets the constraints of the salary cap for both sides.

In addition, Thorn has accumulated some interesting complementary pieces in the past few drafts. Promising young players like Nenad Krstic, Marcus Williams, Josh Boone, and Sean Williams are the kind of assets rebuilding clubs crave, so a team trading a star player would expect one or more from that group in return.

I would argue, in fact, that it's the proper move at this point. For instance, whatever the Nets may think of Williams's future, the facts are that he's going to play 10 minutes a game this season. With the team at a point where it needs to play all its chips, it seems almost foolish not to trade him.

The goal here would be to get the one thing the Nets have lacked in recent years — a low-post scorer capable of giving the Nets a halfcourt offense to match their potent running game. Every year, we see opponents cut off the Nets' running game in the postseason, forcing them to repeatedly run isolations for their only decent half-court scorer, Carter. Inevitably, the other team sends multiple defenders at Carter, repeatedly forcing him to kick the ball to secondary players, and we end up watching somebody like Boki Nachbar take the most important shots of the season.

Fortunately for New Jersey, the trade market is unusually heavy with power forwards. Four standouts have been particularly prominent on the rumor mill of late, each of which offer potential solutions. Here's a quick look at the menu and pricing:

LAMAR ODOM: The Nets supposedly had a three-way deal on the table that would have essentially swapped Jefferson for Odom, but the Bobcats put the kibosh on it because they wouldn't get rid of Gerald Wallace. Odom would be an odd fit anyway — his best skill is as a point forward, but the Nets already have a pretty decent point guard if I recall. Plus, Odom has no post game — he's more a jack-of-all-trades, master-of-none type. He's a slight improvement on Jefferson, mainly due to durability, but this doesn't move my pulse much.

JERMAINE O'NEAL: The Nets and Pacers already talked about this deal once and are likely to revisit it if nothing else can be found. Reportedly, Indiana asked for a king's ransom — Jefferson, Krstic, Jason Collins, and Williams — while the Nets would only do the deal without Williams in it. Given O'Neal's injury proneness and erratic offensive output the past two years, I'm not sure he's worth the price. However, he's become a monster on D and would fit well in Jersey's system.

PAU GASOL: Now we're talking. This is easily the best post player available, though I use that term loosely — Memphis seems to have cooled on the idea of dealing him. Though prying him away from the Griz would be expensive — Jefferson, Krstic, and a first-rounder would be the minimum ante — this is the one player who fits in the best. He can run the floor with Kidd and Carter, he can score in the post, and he's a great passer. Plus, he's still in his prime at 27. Of course, those all are reasons the Grizzlies probably will relent and keep him.

KEVIN GARNETT: Ah, dare to dream, people. The Nets can't realistically absorb his salary and he's not really a post scorer, but he's far and away the best player out there. That's why the Nets — like nearly every other team — are trying in vain to find a way to make this work. Don't hold your breath.

jhollinger@nysun.com


Reader comments on this article

Comment By Date

Let met get this straight, you dont like Odom, you dont think O'Neal is worth the price, you think the... [MORE]

Jeff 

Jul 27, 2007 11:18

I understand what you are saying and I agree that if the nets wanna win they should pull the trigger... [MORE]

JN 

Jul 27, 2007 14:34

That is a great point, Jeff. Although I agree with the main premisethat New Jersey needs to do something. Stop... [MORE]

Seth in AZ 

Jul 27, 2007 16:02

I think J.O. would be the best addition to the teamoutside of KG obviously, but it would surely leave a... [MORE]

Nadav 

Jul 28, 2007 13:42

Jeff you're right. This article goes no where. What's the point of writing an article with no ending? So basically... [MORE]

Derek 

Jul 28, 2007 22:39

maybe get the price lowered on J O'Neal and get him to NJ [MORE]

Gary G 

Jul 28, 2007 22:59

How could you possibly say that Lamar Odom would be a bad fit for the Nets? Jefferson and Carter are... [MORE]

Anthony 

Jul 29, 2007 12:18

The Odom trade is a wash and isn't going to move the needle from 43-39. His durability is not unblemished... [MORE]

Mark T 

Jul 27, 2007 11:55

I've begun to sense a pattern in Mr. Hollinger's Nets articles. Isolating a problem (he's good at this), disparaging RJ's... [MORE]

Eddie Ninja 

Jul 27, 2007 12:34

the big three should stay put and if the nets have to make a trade it should include carter who... [MORE]

roper brown 

Jul 27, 2007 13:04

I guess it is time to shut it down once a player turns 30, hell, even 25 is over-the-hill these... [MORE]

Dan 

Jul 27, 2007 14:58

O'Neal will absolutely help. And the deal is doable. The problem is to get a backup point, how about Brevin... [MORE]

eddie b 

Jul 27, 2007 16:14

Hollinger, You got lucky last year with your prediction on the Nets record. They're record was deflated by the Kristic and... [MORE]

Thomas DiFiore 

Jul 27, 2007 16:19

yes, your prediction is quite accurate. After losing Nenad Krstic and Richard Jefferson for a combined 62 regular season games,... [MORE]

Mike M. 

Jul 27, 2007 22:43

The Nets will continue to be an average team until they rid themselves of L. Frank. He is one of... [MORE]

Eugene 

Jul 28, 2007 10:59

but did the nets not get a low post presence in magloire, who might have been a little lazy in... [MORE]

Ben Laurent 

Jul 28, 2007 12:22

The list of teams that kill their long-term prospects by chasing big names with declining games is depressingly long, and... [MORE]

Eric 

Jul 29, 2007 12:36

i dont think the Nets would need a dominant post player. look at mikki moore, he wasnt even recognized til... [MORE]

KiddFan 

Jul 30, 2007 11:08