First, We Take Jerusalem

This article is from the archive of The New York Sun before the launch of its new website in 2022. The Sun has neither altered nor updated such articles but will seek to correct any errors, mis-categorizations or other problems introduced during transfer.

The New York Sun

Ridley Scott’s Crusades movie, “Kingdom of Heaven,” though visually impressive as we might expect, is shockingly unhistorical. I know that this is not supposed to matter and probably will not to the historically illiterate 13-year-olds who will make up its primary audience, but the rest of us might at least want to be aware of the crudity of the historical realization here.


Well, it’s not as if you couldn’t guess. It turns out that the Crusades were not the struggle between Christians and Muslims that you might have thought they were, but between both Muslim and Christian religious fanatics on the one hand and modern tolerant liberals like Scott and his screenwriter, William Monahan – oh, and, by the way, everyone else in Hollywood – on the other. Who knew?


The most hilariously idiotic of the film’s many historically stupid moments comes at the climax of the battle for Jerusalem in 1187 when Balian of Ibelin (Orlando Bloom), the commander of the city’s Christian defenders, has a parley with the leader of its Muslim besiegers, Saladin, here invariably given his more authentic moniker, Salah al-Din (Ghassan Massoud).


Balian tells his adversary that he will surrender the city if the Muslim army will give its Christian inhabitants safe conduct to the sea, where they may take ship to return to Europe. The terrible alternative, Balian tells him, is that he will give the order for all the religious sites in the city to be destroyed: “Your holy places, ours – everything that drives men mad.”


It’s hard to imagine a more perfect example of Hollywood’s view of religion – or of a thought that would have been more unthinkable to the person supposedly uttering it. Another character says, “I put no stock in religion,” and, generally speaking, we are to understand that neither does anyone else here who is in the least sympathetic. The only true religious believers, at least on the Christian side, are thugs and murderers.


But at the time of the Crusades, “religion” wasn’t the optional Sunday-morning pastime it has since become. It was a matter of identity. For someone to say “I put no stock in religion” would have been as nonsensical as saying “I put no stock in being my father’s son.” People’s religion wasn’t just what they believed, it was what they were.


In other words, like so many moviemakers before them, Messrs. Scott and Monahan have looked into the past and seen nothing but their own silly faces looking back at them.


Here are a few other historical howlers. Balian, the hero of the film, is not only a proleptic liberal secularist, he’s also a humble blacksmith who becomes a knight overnight – or overknight, I guess, like Sir Ridley himself. A quick tap with a sword and a quick lesson in swordsmanship from his long-lost father, Godfrey (Liam Neeson), and Balian becomes the top knight among the Christians and in short order is given command of all the Christian armies.


But though military science was very different in those days, it was no more to be picked up in a day or two – or a year or two – than it is today. The profession of knighthood was a highly skilled one and something that any effective fighter, let alone a commander, would have learned over many years and many battles.


Where the blacksmith turns out to be an expert soldier with little or no training, the experienced soldiers among the Christian knights, especially Balian’s archenemy Guy de Lusignan (Marton Csokas), are so stupid that they march off to do battle with the Saracens apparently unaware that they will need water. Like all the other examples of Christian stupidity, this is attributable to their religion.


Of course the Christian knights are slaughtered. Guy was so credulous that he thought God would give him victory against a vastly superior Saracen enemy and without any special preparation just because he was a Christian. What a fool! Well, granting Sir Ridley his premise that Guy and all the other Christians, especially the Templars – remember them, from “The Da Vinci Code?” – are fools for believing at all, I’d like to see the historical warrant for supposing that any of them were as foolish as this.


Once all the knights are slaughtered or have fled, Balian the overnight knight takes charge of the defense of Jerusalem by repeating his own experience and dubbing hundreds of knights at once from among the unmilitary rabble. “Will your making them knights make them better fighters?” asks the craven Bishop.


“Yes,” says Balian, obviously an adherent of the Norman Vincent Peale, “Power of Positive Thinking” school of warfare himself. Well, he ought to know.


Though all the knights who weren’t killed have left, they have apparently left behind all their armor, equipment, and weaponry for the use of the overknights in the defense of the city. Or perhaps Saladin shipped the dead knights’ kit back from the battlefield to give his enemies a sporting chance.


It could happen! Obviously, Saladin is a decent guy, unlike the Christians. And when Balian, naked and on foot, defeats an Arab knight, armed and armored, on horseback, he does so by urging him to “fight fair.” The Arab knight then obligingly dismounts.


Of course, in the 12th century, the idea of “fighting fair” would have been approximately as unfamiliar as that of agnostic religious tolerance. It just couldn’t have happened like that. Nor would any knight in his right mind have parted from his armor or weapons without being dead first. These were precious things, usually made for them personally. All knights knew that their lives depended on them, whether or not they were on a battlefield.


Equally improbably, Guy’s toothsome young wife Sibylla (Eva Green) openly despises him and gads about the countryside on her own in some very fetching makeup – like “Sex and the City” on horseback. Naturally, she throws herself at hunky Balian. Later, in a snit because Balian has conscience pangs about killing Guy to marry his widow, she goes back to her husband and becomes Queen.


But – and here comes a spoiler, folks, as if you couldn’t guess it for yourselves – she gives this all up for Balian in the end, returning with him to France and life as a humble blacksmith’s wife. When King Richard the Lionheart of England stops by his smithy on the way to the next futile Crusade, looking for the legendary Balian, he simply says: “I’m the blacksmith.”


Well, he and Sibylla have obviously hung on to some of the swag from their days in power – she has a very chic fur cape, for instance – so it’s not as if the whole wealth thing is an issue here as it was, really (according to Jeremy Irons’s wise old Tiberias), for all the other crusaders. Hell no, he won’t go.


I could, as they say, go on. Though without any particular expertise or knowledge about the Crusades themselves, I think a very basic historical knowledge should be sufficient to tell that it is mere nonsense to make the lesson they teach the virtues of liberal and secular governments in the holy land – a good half a millennium before people had any idea of the existence of such things. Whatever the truth about the Crusades, this cannot be it. Or even close to it.


The New York Sun

© 2025 The New York Sun Company, LLC. All rights reserved.

Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. The material on this site is protected by copyright law and may not be reproduced, distributed, transmitted, cached or otherwise used.

The New York Sun

Sign in or  Create a free account

or
By continuing you agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use