Bank of New York Fails To Set Aside Funds for Loss
This article is from the archive of The New York Sun before the launch of its new website in 2022. The Sun has neither altered nor updated such articles but will seek to correct any errors, mis-categorizations or other problems introduced during transfer.
A financial expert who was hired by the Russians to look into the financial standing of the Bank of New York Mellon, Kenneth Thomas, has launched a letter-writing and telephone campaign to warn regulators that the bank made a mistake is deciding against setting up a special contingency reserve for potential damages related to the case.
“Assuming a $22.5 billion judgment, which could reportedly happen as early as June 30, 2008, and assuming just a portion of it is enforced in the more than 90 countries in which the company deals, this could have a significant adverse impact on it in several areas such as capital, liquidity, and reputation,” Mr. Thomas wrote in a letter to the Federal Reserve chairman, Ben Bernanke, last week. “For example, if 25% of the $22.5 billion judgment is ultimately enforced, this would be $5.6 billion or about one-third of the company’s $17.2 billion of capital as of March 31. Even assuming a 10% outcome, we are talking about $2.25 billion or more than 10% of their capital.”
A spokeswoman for the Federal Reserve declined to comment on the correspondence.
Accounting rules dictate that a company doesn’t need to set aside money for a potentially damaging court ruling unless the loss is “probable” — more than a 50% chance it will happen — and unless it is possible to estimate what the damages are likely to be.
“The enforcement of any adverse judgment in this case is neither probable nor estimable, therefore a reserve would be inappropriate under the FASB accounting rules,” a bank spokesman, Jeep Bryant, said.