
Everything’s Bigger in Texas, Even Political Donations From Sex Offenders
By DAVID MASTIO
|The president’s key filing is struck for being ‘decidedly improper and impermissible.’

President Trump often has a point when he decries partisan rulings from the federal bench. In the case of the president’s $15 billion libel suit against the Times, though, the sledding might not be easy. A judge just struck Mr. Trump’s basic complaint for being “decidedly improper and impermissible” in its imprecision, florid language, and, our word here, hysterical nature. He gave the 47th president 28 days to rewrite the complaint in accord with the rules.

By DAVID MASTIO
|
By A.R. HOFFMAN
|
By HOLLIE McKAY
|
By HOLLIE McKAY
|
By NEWT GINGRICH
|
By ROSARIO IACONIS
|
By HOLLIE McKAY
|
By HOLLIE McKAY
|President Trump often has a point when he decries partisan rulings from the federal bench. In the case of the president’s $15 billion libel suit against the Times, though, the sledding might not be easy. A judge just struck Mr. Trump’s basic complaint for being “decidedly improper and impermissible” in its imprecision, florid language, and, our word here, hysterical nature. He gave the 47th president 28 days to rewrite the complaint in accord with the rules.
Already have a subscription? Sign in to continue reading
Cancel anytime
By continuing you agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms of Service.
Cancel anytime