The campaign to drive David Malpass from the presidency of the World Bank erupted into the open this week when the lanky lender was invited to speak onstage at a climate event hosted by the New York Times. Fellow speakers included the two bitterest figures in the Democratic party — its back to back failed nominees for president, Al Gore and John Kerry, who in recent years have been working the climate change shakedown.

The latest action began Tuesday at the Times event, with Vice President Gore denouncing Mr. Malpass as a “climate denier.” Secretary Kerry claimed the bank wasn’t lending enough to his favored cause. When Mr. Malpass took the stage, the moderator, a Times reporter, was agitated enough to demand that Mr. Malpass acknowledge that the warming of the planet was caused by man and could be described with the adverb “rapidly.”

The Times issued two stories on Mr. Malpass’s failure to conform. The second story, by the event moderator, drummed up one figure after another to bay for Mr. Malpass’s ouster, never mind that World Bank presidents serve on a contract. And that it’s hard to think of a steadier, or more knowledgeable, hand at the helm of this most high-minded of the Bretton Woods institutions than Mr. Malpass, a common sense Republican of the old school.

What’s really happening here is that the Democratic party wants the World Bank to use its faith and credit to subsidize climate change projects not only of governments but also in the private sector. They want the World Bank to write guarantees for public and private lending — obligations that would ultimately go back to the American taxpayer, among others. They want to hijack the World Bank’s mission to make it a climate bank.

Willie “the Actor” Sutton couldn’t have come up with a more cynical scheme for removing money from a government bank. Yet  the climate movement is in a terrible swivet because one country after another is moving in a conservative direction on this head. Think of Poland, say, or Hungary, not to mention Japan, and, following the recent parliamentary elections, France. Plus too, the United Kingdom. 

Britain has just elevated a crusty Conservative, Elizabeth “Liz” Truss, to be prime minister. And what is the great green country of Germany — which has barely finished sidelining its nuclear capacity — doing now? It’s scrambling to go back to coal, owing to Russia cutting back on the natural gas that Germany would rather burn. It’s almost enough to make one shed a tear for Messrs. Gore and Kerry.

We would, too, if they weren’t given to ad hominem attacks over policy. In the U.S. Treasury, in private enterprise, and in public debate on the economy, Mr. Malpass has a long record of reasonableness. He is not a denier of any facts on climate change. Wait, though, why are Messrs. Kerry and Gore denying the World Bank’s priority of helping poor countries work toward prosperity? What’re Messrs. Gore and Kerry, poverty deniers?