
Did Netanyahu Try To Instigate War To Disrupt the Election?
By BENNY AVNI
|The 47th president argues that courts have yet to reckon with the full extent of the protection he is owed.

The Supreme Court’s landmark immunity decision in Trump v. United States is emerging as a centerpiece of the president’s appellate efforts to upend verdicts in two cases — the civil one brought by E. Jean Carroll and the criminal one that turns on payments to the adult film actress Stormy Daniels. Both appear likely to reach the high court, and in both the justices could accept the president’s invitation to extend the reach of Trump.

By BENNY AVNI
|
By SHARON KEHNEMUI
|
By MATTHEW RICE
|
By DEAN KARAYANIS
|
By MATTHEW RICE
|
By GEORGE WILL
|
By SEBASTIAN DOGGART
|
By CARLOS SOUSA
|The Supreme Court’s landmark immunity decision in Trump v. United States is emerging as a centerpiece of the president’s appellate efforts to upend verdicts in two cases — the civil one brought by E. Jean Carroll and the criminal one that turns on payments to the adult film actress Stormy Daniels. Both appear likely to reach the high court, and in both the justices could accept the president’s invitation to extend the reach of Trump.
Already have a subscription? Sign in to continue reading
Cancel anytime
By continuing you agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms of Service.
Cancel anytime