Say what you will about Sam Bankman-Fried, but you can’t say the Twitterverse is uninterested in his money or his freedom. The news that Mr. Bankman-Fried will be allowed bail of $250 million and a relocation to his parents’ home at Palo Alto to await trial lit up social media and marked another twist in the fast-moving legal drama.  

That fate was decided at a federal courthouse at Manhattan on Thursday. Mr. Bankman-Fried was sartorially transformed, exchanging his trademark T-shirt and cargo shorts for a black suit jacket and white button-down shirt, no tie. The jacket was crumpled. 

Prosecutors have called Mr. Bankman-Fried’s machinations at FTX and Alameda Research “one of the biggest financial frauds” in American history. Shortly before he was arrested, he told the BBC that he “didn’t knowingly commit fraud” and “didn’t want any of this to happen.” 

According to CNBC, Mr. Bankman-Fried’s bail was secured by equity on the family house, as well as the signatures of two other individuals with “considerable assets.” The total dwarfs the $10 million assigned to the infamous Bernards — Ebbers and Madoff — and matches the one levied on the junk bond king, Michael Milken.

Mr. Bankman-Fried claims that following the collapse of his crypto empire, he has “close to nothing” left and has been reduced to one viable credit card with “maybe $100,000 in that bank account.” In recent days the law’s long arm brought him to a courtroom at Lower Manhattan from a Bahamian jail. 

With that relatively paltry figure in mind, a billionaire investor and hedge fund manager, William “Bill” Ackman, took to Twitter to thunder that Mr. Bankman-Fried “posting $250m of bail is itself a criminal indictment and refutation of everything he has said to date.” 

That skepticism was shared by entrepreneur Vivek Ramaswamy, who scoffed, “It’s amazing where you can find a quarter billion if you really need it.” Referring to Mr. Bankman-Fried by his nickname, a writer and television host, Clay Travis, wanted to know “how does SBF still have $250 million to make bail?”

In short, he doesn’t. Mr. Bankman-Fried is not obligated to possess assets equivalent to the entirety of the bail total; he only has to be able to show the court that he can summon a portion of it — usually 10 percent. The value of his parents’ home, situated in the affluent precincts of one of America’s wealthiest neighborhoods — along with other guarantees was enough to satisfy the court.

Under the terms of the agreement, he will not be allowed to make financial transactions for more than $1,000 or open new lines of credit. He can only leave his parents’ manse for exercise, and is required to enroll in substance abuse and mental health treatment.

In a pair of ill-boding omens for Mr. Bankman-Fried, two of his lieutenants pleaded guilty to fraud charges in recent days. Those pleas by the chief executive of Alameda Research, Caroline Ellison, Mr. Bankman-Fried’s former girlfriend, and a FTX co-founder, Gary Wang, suggest that they will cooperate with prosecutors.