A Fine Line Between Loyalty and Betrayal

This article is from the archive of The New York Sun before the launch of its new website in 2022. The Sun has neither altered nor updated such articles but will seek to correct any errors, mis-categorizations or other problems introduced during transfer.

The New York Sun

“There’s honor among thieves, they say.” So says Police Inspector Clain (Jean Desailly) to the impossibly glamorous antihero Silien (Jean-Paul Belmondo) in Jean-Pierre Melville’s “Le Doulos.” This classic of 1962, which begins a two-week revival at Film Forum today, bears him out, though it also shows us that betrayal is the way of the world.

The title is usually translated as “The Finger Man,” though “The Snitch” would be more idiomatic. But the difference between loyalty and betrayal is never what it seems, as in the classic film noir of which Melville was a big fan.

Silien, a small-time hoodlum and a reputed police informer from the Parisian milieu, would “do anything for a friend — on either side of the law,” his friend Jean (Philippe March) tells us.

This makes it particularly unfortunate that, of the only two friends he has apart from Jean, one is a criminal, Maurice Faugel (Serge Reggiani), and the other is a cop, Salignari (Daniel Crohem). When Salignari and some other policemen interrupt Maurice and an accomplice in the middle of a robbery, the accomplice and Salignari are both killed and Maurice is wounded.

Escaping with a bullet in his shoulder, Maurice soon faints from loss of blood and is picked up and taken — we don’t yet know how — to Jean’s place. He believes that Silien has ratted him out and vows vengeance.

But is it true? By skillful use of point-of-view filmmaking, Melville first persuades us that it is, and then that it is not. It is said that even Mr. Belmondo did not know the truth about his character until he saw the finished film upon its commercial release.

Of course, the point is to submerge us in moral ambiguity, a hallmark of noir filmmaking. This ambiguity is summed up by Maurice in his explanation of a betrayal of his own, which takes place in the movie’s introductory scenes.

There, Gilbert (René Lefèvre), another partner in crime who has been looking after Maurice since his release from prison and showing him great kindness, lends him his revolver, ostensibly for the job that is later interrupted by Salignari. Maurice promptly shoots him.

Subsequently, Maurice explains that Gilbert had been treating him so well in order to make up for killing a girlfriend of his while he was in prison.

“He became my friend,” Maurice says regretfully. “Killing Gilbert was hard. I probably wouldn’t have done it but for a casual, irreparable gesture. He turned and saw the gun aimed at him. You don’t aim at a friend. There was only one thing to do.” The betrayal, that is, had been at least partly inadvertent — but then, paradoxically, it had become a matter of honor for him to complete it.

It’s partly a comic idea, and in “Le Doulos” comedy of an absurdist stripe more than once seems to obtrude on the grim drama of honor and betrayal — as it did more obviously and explicitly in Melville’s “Bob Le Flambeur” of 1955.

Sometimes this comedy now must seem unintentional, as when a gravely wounded man struggles toward a telephone, his only means of summoning help, and with his dying breath uses it to cancel a dinner engagement.

We shouldn’t rule out the possibility that Melville intended a bit of black comedy here, but I think it’s more likely that he allowed his admiration for quixotic acts of chivalry and generosity and even politesse to go a little over the top at a particularly unfortunate moment.

But this is not a flaw. In fact, I like “Le Doulos” all the better for it. Tastes may differ, but I find the leavening of humor, whether intentional or unintentional, makes the film’s noirish concoction of French-style nihilism and romantic criminality go down a lot easier.

There is a strong period feel to it, of course. Melville invites us to admire the two thieves and murderers, Maurice and Silien, because in the midst of an inevitable moral chaos they are at least true to themselves and to each other, a sentiment that would be inconceivable without the Left Bank existentialism of the French 1950s.

Also dating the film are the trench coats, hats, and cigarettes, the big American cars that the heroes (like Melville himself ) all seem to drive, the cool jazz soundtrack, and the casual or brutal treatment of women — which will be fatally off-putting for some — especially poor Thérèse (Monique Hennessy), Maurice’s hapless girlfriend.

In a particularly effective scene, Silien visits Thérèse when he knows Maurice is out. His intentions appear dubious at first before he eventually appears, in the end, to have been acting in Maurice’s best interests. The point is that, whatever you do, “in this business, you end up either a bum or dead.” Sounds about right.

Through July 12 (209 W. Houston St., between Sixth Avenue and Varick Street, 212-727-8110).


The New York Sun

© 2025 The New York Sun Company, LLC. All rights reserved.

Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. The material on this site is protected by copyright law and may not be reproduced, distributed, transmitted, cached or otherwise used.

The New York Sun

Sign in or  Create a free account

or
By continuing you agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use