Ground Zero Rising

This article is from the archive of The New York Sun before the launch of its new website in 2022. The Sun has neither altered nor updated such articles but will seek to correct any errors, mis-categorizations or other problems introduced during transfer.

The New York Sun

In the nearly six years since the September 11, 2001, terrorist attacks, ground zero has remained a hole in the ground that is a considerable embarrassment to New York City and to America.

But, alas, things appear to be taking shape. Construction proceeds on the site, timetables exist, and exciting designs by several of the world’s most famous architects flash across computer screens in splendid animations. Those images come from the blandly named Lower Manhattan Construction Command Center (www.lowermanhattan.info), established by Governor Pataki and Mayor Bloomberg in 2004 to coordinate the construction activities that promise to bring new life to lower Manhattan, if ever the jackhammers stop.

Back in late 2001, some of us foretold the fiasco that rebuilding ground zero would become. Whatever was to be built had to be meaningful. But we’d spent the better part of the last century cheerily jettisoning symbolism that reeked of humanity’s past, yet failing to replace it with anything but crude literalism and minimalism. Maya Lin’s Vietnam Veterans Memorial in Washington, D.C. succeeded because what it commemorates had become so controversial that the memorial’s silence seemed — certainly seems to the millions of visitors for whom the memorial is unquestionably wildly popular — appropriate. But what of ground zero? The Lower Manhattan Development Corporation chose a “Freedom Tower” design by the Bronx-bred, Berlin-based avant-garde architect Daniel Libeskind. Its principal symbolic gesture — retained in the much-revised version of the design by Skidmore, Owings & Merrill’s David Childs — consists in its 1,776-foot height. Because modern design lacks the words for courage or grief, we resort to commemorating the terrorist attacks by reference to our breaking free from our staunchest ally. I suppose we’ve mitigated the unintentional insult by hiring Norman Foster and Richard Rogers, British “star-chitects,” to design two of the four towers slated for the site. (The fourth tower we gave to the Japanese Fumihiko Maki.)

In addition to the four towers, the site shall hold a cultural center by the Norwegian architects Snøhetta, a memorial park by Michael Arad and Peter Walker and, most exciting of all, a transportation hub by the supremely gifted Spanish engineer Santiago Calatrava.

Meanwhile, on September 11, the Municipal Art Society, the City of New York, and others will again present the “Tribute in Light,” the two great beams pointing to the sky from the site of the Twin Towers. In the elapsed years, these twin beams have yet to fail to move us. If possible, take a seat on the Promenade in Brooklyn Heights as dusk descends. If seeing the beams framed by the Statue of Liberty and the Brooklyn Bridge does not move you, nothing will.

Outside the World Trade Center “bathtub” itself, not everything is so shameful. Yes, there’s the Deutsche Bank Building, a balefully ugly building to begin with that then stood years in a shroud. (Even dismantling it added yet another tragic chapter to its neighborhood’s history, when a recent blaze there killed two firefighters). But the glass Winter Garden of the World Financial Center, across West Street from ground zero, shattered when the towers collapsed, came miraculously back to life within a year. Funny how good-looking we never knew it was before. And Larry Silverstein, unencumbered by the constraints on the main site, got the new 7 World Trade Center built efficiently and expeditiously, and David Childs’s tower fairly gleams.

As for ground zero, we await a lot of high tech-style stuff — hard-edged, finely tooled, very shiny buildings by architects who know from purveying such fare. None of it looks to me to be outstanding, though I am sure it will all add up to a striking, if not inspiring, image. The exception, of course, may be the Calatrava train station.

From the viewing platform at the east end of the Winter Garden, one looks right down upon ground zero. Looking beyond it, one sees St. Paul’s Chapel, until now and for the near future the de facto World Trade Center memorial, the out-of-town crowds filing through the handsome 1760s church in numbers that, six years on, still impress. One also sees three buildings, each of which once claimed the title of tallest office building in the world. Just beyond St. Paul’s stands the twin-cupolaed Park Row Building, a gawky edifice that won its title in 1899. To the left of St. Paul’s, at Barclay Street, rises the 1913 Woolworth Building, to the glorious lobby of which the building’s post-Woolworth owners have unconscionably forbidden public entry since well before the terrorist attacks. To the right of One Liberty Plaza, 40 Wall Street rises to a green pyramidal top. In 1929, it ranked number one in height. A year later, however, its architect Craig Severance’s former partner, William Van Alen, built the Chrysler Building on 42nd Street and stole the title.

The Twin Towers themselves briefly, before Chicago’s Sears Tower went up, claimed the tallest-buildings title. Today, Taipei, Dubai, and Kuala Lumpur have the really tall buildings. New York has a big hole in the ground.


The New York Sun

© 2025 The New York Sun Company, LLC. All rights reserved.

Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. The material on this site is protected by copyright law and may not be reproduced, distributed, transmitted, cached or otherwise used.

The New York Sun

Sign in or  create a free account

or
By continuing you agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use