
MoMA Animates the Case for Experimental ’Toons
By WILL FRIEDWALD
|This article is from the archive of The New York Sun before the launch of its new website in 2022. The Sun has neither altered nor updated such articles but will seek to correct any errors, mis-categorizations or other problems introduced during transfer.

Published:
Updated:
There’s almost enough chalk dust in the first episode of “Numb3rs,” the new CBS procedural crime drama that debuts this Sunday night after football, to cover the holes in the show’s concept – but not quite. Aside from the obvious weaknesses of a show that shamelessly mimics the model of “CSI,” “Numb3rs” also suffers from a fatal flaw: it isn’t built to last. There’s nothing in the pilot episode – about yet another serial rapist/killer on the loose in Los Angeles – that makes you want to come back for episode two, let alone season two. “Numb3rs” is, if nothing else, aptly named; it’s by-the-numbers programming by executives trying to fool us into watching a show we’ve seen a million times before.

By WILL FRIEDWALD
|
By THE NEW YORK SUN
|
By LAWRENCE KUDLOW
|
By BENNY AVNI
|
By THE NEW YORK SUN
|
By JOSEPH CURL
|
By ALEX ZDAN
|
By MATTHEW RICE
|There’s almost enough chalk dust in the first episode of “Numb3rs,” the new CBS procedural crime drama that debuts this Sunday night after football, to cover the holes in the show’s concept – but not quite. Aside from the obvious weaknesses of a show that shamelessly mimics the model of “CSI,” “Numb3rs” also suffers from a fatal flaw: it isn’t built to last. There’s nothing in the pilot episode – about yet another serial rapist/killer on the loose in Los Angeles – that makes you want to come back for episode two, let alone season two. “Numb3rs” is, if nothing else, aptly named; it’s by-the-numbers programming by executives trying to fool us into watching a show we’ve seen a million times before.
Already have a subscription? Sign in to continue reading
Cancel anytime
By continuing you agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms of Service.