
Privilege Meets Its Reckoning in ‘Aftermath’
By ELYSA GARDNER
|This article is from the archive of The New York Sun before the launch of its new website in 2022. The Sun has neither altered nor updated such articles but will seek to correct any errors, mis-categorizations or other problems introduced during transfer.

Published:
Updated:
Unless you are a character in Louis Auchincloss’s “Tales of Manhattan” – one of those Groton grads who hold forth on French academic painting – you may never have visited the Dahesh Museum. Its collection of academic art of the 19th and early 20th centuries is considered a defunct currency, like tsarist bonds. The Modernist enterprise has displaced lebeau ideal and the assumptions that transmit it. Just last year Joe Queenan, writing in the Times, insisted the Dahesh was full of “uncompromising twaddle” that was “too bad to be true.”

By ELYSA GARDNER
|
By BENNY AVNI
|
By JOSEPH CURL
|
By MICHAEL BARONE
|
By NEWT GINGRICH
|
By WILL FRIEDWALD
|
By MARIO NAVES
|
By GARY GASTELU
|Unless you are a character in Louis Auchincloss’s “Tales of Manhattan” – one of those Groton grads who hold forth on French academic painting – you may never have visited the Dahesh Museum. Its collection of academic art of the 19th and early 20th centuries is considered a defunct currency, like tsarist bonds. The Modernist enterprise has displaced lebeau ideal and the assumptions that transmit it. Just last year Joe Queenan, writing in the Times, insisted the Dahesh was full of “uncompromising twaddle” that was “too bad to be true.”
Already have a subscription? Sign in to continue reading
Cancel anytime
By continuing you agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms of Service.
Cancel anytime