Biden’s Attempt To Gag President Trump Is an Attack on the Rights of Defendants

Imagine being prosecuted and being unable to speak out, proclaim your innocence and show why the case against you is unfair.

AP/Jose Luis Magana
Special counsel Jack Smith on June 9, 2023, at Washington. AP/Jose Luis Magana

Day by day, your right to speak freely is being robbed by the Biden administration. This time, Team Biden wants to gag defendants from criticizing government prosecutors.  That’s how courts are run in countries like Pakistan, Russia, and North Korea.

Anyone can fall into the government’s crosshairs. Imagine being prosecuted and being unable to speak out, proclaim your innocence and show why the case against you is unfair.

On Friday, special prosecutor Jack Smith asked the court for an order to gag President Trump from discussing the evidence the government plans to use against him or even criticize the government’s lawyers. 

Prosecutors are required to show the defendant all evidence that will be presented in the trial, but Mr. Smith is refusing to do so until Mr. Trump is gagged.

The judge, Tanya Chutkan, gave Mr. Trump’s lawyers only until Monday at 5 pm to respond to this request, asking them to “redline” any objections to the order.  That’s alarming. The entire request is contrary to a defendant’s rights to free speech and a public, impartial trial.

No one questions that Mr. Trump is a loudmouth. On Saturday night at a GOP dinner in South Carolina, the former president told the crowd that Mr. Smith is a “deranged, sick person.”

Mr. Trump’s entitled to his opinion. After all, Mr. Smith’s calling him a criminal. If the government were trying to lock you up for the rest of your life, you’d have a lot to say too.

Trying to muzzle any defendant goes contrary to what the  Bill of Rights and two centuries of American law stand for: putting the rights of the defendant ahead of any other considerations.  

In 1986, the Supreme Court ruled in Press-Enterprise Company v. Superior Court of California that the Constitution  guarantees not only that trials are public but also that pre-trial proceedings are open to the public, except in the rare circumstance that nondisclosure is needed to protect the defendant.  

One of those rare circumstances is the upcoming trial of accused killer Bryan Kohberger.  The court has limited what attorneys and the families of the victims can say to the press to increase the likelihood that an impartial jury can be selected.  

That gag order is all about protecting the defendant.  Mr. Smith is trying to do the opposite – gag the defendant to protect the government’s case.  And the government’s pre-trial public relations campaign.

That’s an outrage against voters.  Mr. Trump is running for President, and if the trial doesn’t take place before the election and Mr. Trump is muzzled,  the public gets only one side of the story. The prosecution’s version.   

Mr. Smith is already demagoguing, telling the public he’s holding Trump accountable for the rioting at the Capitol on January 6th, when in fact the indictment has nothing to do with the violence at the Capitol that day.

Whether in court or in the court of public opinion, both sides have to be heard to get at the truth. That’s the American way.

It’s especially vital with a prosecutor as sneaky and unprincipled as Mr. Smith. Again and again, Mr. Smith has targeted politicians, stretching and twisting the meaning of the law to bring charges against them, and then failing to make the charges stick.

He indicted former presidential aspirant John Edwards in 2011 for taking illegal campaign contributions, but a jury didn’t buy it.

Mr. Smith prosecuted Senator Menendez of New Jersey on public corruption charges, but that case ended in 2017  in a mistrial too.

The overzealous prosecutor also went after the former governor of Virginia, Robert McDonnell. Mr. Smith won a conviction, but in 2016, it was overturned by a unanimous Supreme Court, which chastised Mr. Smith for the “Government’s boundless interpretation of the federal bribery statute.”  The Justices warned the nation about “the uncontrolled power of criminal prosecutors.”

Amen.

Attorney General Garland should have considered Mr. Smith’s shameful record before appointing him special prosecutor to investigate possible wrongdoing by Mr. Trump. But then again, Mr. Garland likely wanted a hit man.

Tell Judge Chutkan to deny Mr. Smith’s un-American gag order. The defendant and the public deserve a fair trial. That’s what the US Constitution guarantees.


The New York Sun

© 2024 The New York Sun Company, LLC. All rights reserved.

Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. The material on this site is protected by copyright law and may not be reproduced, distributed, transmitted, cached or otherwise used.

The New York Sun

Sign in or  create a free account

By continuing you agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use