Congress Votes To Halt Oil Shipments
This article is from the archive of The New York Sun before the launch of its new website in 2022. The Sun has neither altered nor updated such articles but will seek to correct any errors, mis-categorizations or other problems introduced during transfer.

WASHINGTON — Congress voted overwhelmingly yesterday to challenge President Bush to temporarily halt the daily shipment of thousands of barrels of oil into the government’s emergency reserve.
Lawmakers disagreed on what — if any — impact the suspension might have on gasoline prices and acknowledged it was but “a modest step” in addressing public anger over soaring energy costs.
Mr. Bush has steadfastly refused to halt shipments of about 70,000 barrel barrels of oil a day into the Strategic Petroleum Reserve, a system of salt caverns on the Gulf coast. The reserve, created to respond to major oil supply disruptions, holds 701 million barrels and is 97% near capacity.
“There is no evidence that [suspending shipments] will affect the price of oil or gasoline in a meaningful way,” a White House spokesman, Scott Stanzel, said. He said the president opposes any congressional mandate to stop deliveries and believes Congress should focus on broader energy issues.
The Senate voted 97-1 to suspend the shipments for the rest of the year. Hours later, the House followed suit, voting 385-25 to halt the deliveries. The votes don’t compel Mr. Bush to act because the measures differ somewhat and would need to be reconciled before final congressional approval.
Still the votes were symbolic, in their strong bipartisan support, of lawmakers’ frustrations at not being able to agree on anything more substantive in response to public anger over near $4 a gallon gasoline and oil prices in the $125 a barrel range.
“We are buying the most expensive crude oil in the history of the world and storing it,” Senator Dorgan, a Democrat from North Dakota, said. “When American consumers are burning at the stake by high energy prices, the government ought not be carrying the wood.”
Rep. John Dingell, a Michigan Democrat, acknowledged there was no guarantee that suspending the deliveries would lower gasoline prices, but declared: “Common sense would say not to take oil off the market during a time of record high prices.”