Distrust of the Press, a Key Factor in Election Outcome, Amounts to a Well-Earned Ignominy

If the 2024 presidential contest proved anything, it’s that the established press no longer drives the national conversation. They can no longer stoke fear and outrage in average voters. They can no longer prop up terrible candidates. And, like him or not, President-elect Trump’s success with Black, Hispanic, and Jewish voters, if exit polls are even close to correct, proves that the entire “fascist” scare was a flop.Indeed, the establishment press are less trusted than virtually any major institution in American life. It’s a well-earned ignominy. It’s also a tragedy for a free nation that we have a barely functioning press. Reporters probably tell themselves they’re disliked because they’re fearless truth-tellers. Only, far more likely, it’s a referendum on their deceit.There was never a reckoning for the Russia collusion hysteria that enveloped the nation or the concerted effort to censor and gaslight us on the Hunter Biden laptop story. There will be no reckoning for spending years fearmongering about the coming Nazism, either.Recall, as well, how we got here. Most of the press had spent four years covering up President Biden’s mental and physical decay by the time the first presidential debate rolled around. It was perhaps the most stage-managed presidency in history, and not one reporter with access to the White House, outside of Fox News, thought it important enough to let us know that the commander in chief could barely function. This, far more than another pedantic fact check of Trump hyperbole, is why we need journalists.When the Wall Street Journal finally ran a well-sourced piece detailing Mr. Biden’s slippage, the paper was widely assailed by the leftist press, which feigned deep concern about the veracity of the sourcing on the story. These are the same people, incidentally, who treat anonymously sourced Atlantic hit pieces as incontestable truth.Those who shared a video of Mr. Biden puttering around aimlessly were accused of spreading conspiracy theories themselves. When Mr. Biden’s fragile mental state could no longer be hidden, the political press immediately, and without any explanation, turned their focus to elbowing out the president and installing Vice President Harris. That’s not just bias — it’s corrupt.Then came “Kamalot,” the shameless, sycophantic, contrived campaign to persuade voters that a woefully inadequate candidate, one who had never won a primary contest, was actually a generational political talent. She went a month without giving a genuine interview or offering as much as extemporaneous comment. In a properly functioning liberal democracy, the press would never have stood for it.When Ms. Harris finally began unleashing her swirling platitude-ridden sentences, it became clear she was in over her head. Once-respected institutions such as “60 Minutes” threw away what was left of their reputation, splicing one of Ms. Harris’ disjointed ramblings into a coherent answer. CBS News has yet to release the transcript of her interview. The rationalization, no doubt, was saving democracy.Most quarters of the press, though, not only refuse to debate but won’t concede that there is a debate. Most days, there isn’t a single person on MSNBC or NBC News or ABC News or CBS News or on any of the editorial pages of most of the biggest newspapers in the country who can articulate positions held by half the country, much less agree with any of them. And, no, stacking your panels with Trump-hating former conservatives who champion every left-policy position imaginable doesn’t count. The zeal of the liberal convert isn’t really serving anyone.On election night, I watched MSNBC’s Joy Reid, Chris Hayes, and Rachel Maddow processing the loss to Trump. These were the people anchoring news coverage. Really, a satirist would struggle to replicate some of the astounding crackpottery I heard. Ms. Reid, as an example, used the word “fascist” with the frequency a normal person might use pronouns. There is a preternatural lack of self-awareness in much of the established press. Not once, for instance, did anyone on that MSNBC panel ever bring up the possible downside of recklessly accusing everyone who disagrees with them of being a “fascist.” Rather, they just kept wondering how all these Americans could vote for Hitler.Even the day after Ms. Harris’ defeat, cable news panels were devolving into struggle sessions and group therapy. It’s almost surely going to get worse before it gets better. The presence of Trump, in fact, promises higher ratings at these outlets. With every debacle, the institution gets worse. There is more insufferable self-glorification. More priggishness. More smugness. A bigger unearned sense of moral superiority. It’s exceedingly doubtful much will change.On the bright side, though, most people have stopped listening.Creators.com

Distrust of the Press, a Key Factor in Election Outcome, Amounts to a Well-Earned Ignominy

More from the New York Sun

Final Release of Epstein Files Details Ties to Tech Titans and Top Officials but Fails To Satisfy Critics

Canada’s Carney Turns Away From American Arms Purchases

‘Melania’ Discloses Little About Our Elusive First Lady

Democrats Say RFK Jr.’s Plan To Make Vaccine Lawsuits Easier Could Enrich His Family

President and Secretary Hillary Clinton Edge Toward Contempt Charges — and Prospect of Prison — as House Set for Historic Vote

‘I’m Not Here To Speak on Politics’: Sydney Sweeney Holds the Line Against Hollywood’s Activism Culture

Law Returning Whole Milk to Public Schools Bolsters Pennsylvania’s Beleaguered Dairy Farmers

Political Dynamite in Census Estimates Suggests Trouble Ahead for Democrats