Democrats’ Lynch-Law Justice Comes for Accused Cornell Fraternity Men
By BETSY McCAUGHEY
|Loading article…
This article is from the archive of The New York Sun before the launch of its new website in 2022. The Sun has neither altered nor updated such articles but will seek to correct any errors, mis-categorizations or other problems introduced during transfer.
Published:
Updated:
Secretary of State Clinton went before the cameras to “take a moment,” as she put it, “to address the video circulating on the internet that has led to these protests in a number of countries. Let me state very clearly, and I hope it is obvious, that the United States government had absolutely nothing to do with this video.” But try this for a thought experiment. What would be the position of Mrs. Clinton, of our government, of our courts, if the United States government had turned out to have had something to do with the video? What, just for the sake of argument, could it do if it had subsidized the making and distribution of “Innocence of the Muslims”?
By BETSY McCAUGHEY
|
By THE NEW YORK SUN
|
By THE NEW YORK SUN
|
By DAVID MASTIO
|
By JAMES BROOKE
|
By JENNIFER DOHERTY
|
By LAWRENCE KUDLOW
|
By LUKE FUNK
|Secretary of State Clinton went before the cameras to “take a moment,” as she put it, “to address the video circulating on the internet that has led to these protests in a number of countries. Let me state very clearly, and I hope it is obvious, that the United States government had absolutely nothing to do with this video.” But try this for a thought experiment. What would be the position of Mrs. Clinton, of our government, of our courts, if the United States government had turned out to have had something to do with the video? What, just for the sake of argument, could it do if it had subsidized the making and distribution of “Innocence of the Muslims”?
Already have a subscription? Sign in to continue reading
Cancel anytime
By continuing you agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms of Service.
Cancel anytime