
What’s Weird and Wonderful?
By LENORE SKENAZY
|This article is from the archive of The New York Sun before the launch of its new website in 2022. The Sun has neither altered nor updated such articles but will seek to correct any errors, mis-categorizations or other problems introduced during transfer.

Published:
Updated:
That could be the headline over the news of the eight to nothing Supreme Court decision in the case known as Rumsfeld v. Forum for Academic and Institutional Rights. The “Forum for Academic and Institutional Rights” included New York University Law School and the faculty of CUNY law school, whose view of First Amendment law was rejected resoundingly yesterday by a high court that includes such liberal lions as Ruth Bader Ginsburg and John Paul Stevens. The court also, by the way, unanimously rejected an alternate interpretation of the law that also opposed Rumsfeld and was offered up by faculty from Columbia and Harvard law schools.

By LENORE SKENAZY
|
By JOSH HAMMER
|
By A.R. HOFFMAN
|
By DAVID JONES
|
By JOSEPH CURL
|
By DAVID JONES
|
By JOSEPH CURL
|
By DAVID HIROSHI JAGER
|That could be the headline over the news of the eight to nothing Supreme Court decision in the case known as Rumsfeld v. Forum for Academic and Institutional Rights. The “Forum for Academic and Institutional Rights” included New York University Law School and the faculty of CUNY law school, whose view of First Amendment law was rejected resoundingly yesterday by a high court that includes such liberal lions as Ruth Bader Ginsburg and John Paul Stevens. The court also, by the way, unanimously rejected an alternate interpretation of the law that also opposed Rumsfeld and was offered up by faculty from Columbia and Harvard law schools.
Already have a subscription? Sign in to continue reading
Cancel anytime
By continuing you agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms of Service.
Cancel anytime