Mayoral Control?

This article is from the archive of The New York Sun before the launch of its new website in 2022. The Sun has neither altered nor updated such articles but will seek to correct any errors, mis-categorizations or other problems introduced during transfer.

The New York Sun

The public school year that begins today is said to be a pivotal one in making the case for an extension of what is known as mayoral control. It is so called to distinguish the present regime from the old Board of Education, which included some mayoral appointees but also individuals appointed by the presidents of the boroughs. The present system is an improvement over what came before and deserves to be extended by the legislature.

But to say that the system is now under the “control” of the mayor is an exaggeration. Mr. Bloomberg must contend with a politicized teachers union that has negotiated a contract curbing management authority over teachers. The principals have their own union. The politicians in Albany who appropriate $8.2 billion a year to the city’s schools and those in Washington who appropriate another $1 billion or so a year do it with plenty of strings attached.

We’re not trying to make excuses for the mayor or for his schools chancellor, nor to belittle them. They are powerful. But as doors open today to more than a million students, the idea that these schools are under the control of the mayor is a fiction.

The New York Sun

© 2023 The New York Sun Company, LLC. All rights reserved.

Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. The material on this site is protected by copyright law and may not be reproduced, distributed, transmitted, cached or otherwise used.

The New York Sun

Sign in or  Create a free account

By continuing you agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use