Federal Judge Orders White House To Restore Live ASL Interpretation at Press Briefings

The court found that removing interpreters caused imminent harm and breached federal disability protections.

Andrew Harnik/Getty Images
White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt during a briefing. Andrew Harnik/Getty Images

The White House will be forced to restore live American Sign Language interpretation at press briefings led by President Donald Trump or press Secretary Karoline Leavitt, following a federal judge’s order.

U.S. District Judge Amir Ali found that the Trump administration’s decision to end ASL interpretation illegally excludes deaf Americans from crucial government updates on war, the economy and public health. The judge also notes that evidence shows closed captioning and transcripts are insufficient alternatives.

“Given the nature of the programming at issue here — regularly scheduled briefings on critical topics implicating markets, medicine, militaries, and myriads of other issues — the court finds that denying deaf Americans access to and the benefit of it presents a clear, present, and imminent harm,” The judge concluded in a preliminary injunction  to require interpretation to immediately resume.

The ruling marks a victory for the National Association of the Deaf which filed a lawsuit against Mr. Trump, saying its members have suffered since the White House ended the Biden-era ASL interpretation policy in January. The group argues the decision violates the 1973 Rehabilitation Act, expanded in 1978 to bar the government from excluding people with disabilities from government programming and communications.

Judge Ali, a Biden appointee, did stop short of the NAD’s request to require ASL interpretation at briefings by Vice President Vance, as well as his wife and First Lady Melania Trump. He also took issue with the Trump Administration claiming that the requirement would be a “major incursion” on its prerogatives and apprehension to having an interpreter share the stage with the president.

“ASL interpretation does not require a speaker to ‘share his platform’ with anyone,” the judge said. 

“The evidence shows, and the court finds, that the defendants can readily implement remote ASL interpretation without an interpreter present in the same room as the speaker.”


The New York Sun

© 2025 The New York Sun Company, LLC. All rights reserved.

Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. The material on this site is protected by copyright law and may not be reproduced, distributed, transmitted, cached or otherwise used.

The New York Sun

Sign in or  create a free account

or
By continuing you agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use