Cartoons Provoke Outcry in Denmark
This article is from the archive of The New York Sun before the launch of its new website in 2022. The Sun has neither altered nor updated such articles but will seek to correct any errors, mis-categorizations or other problems introduced during transfer.

BERLIN – A Danish experiment in testing “the limits of freedom of speech” has backfired – or succeeded spectacularly – after newspaper cartoons of the Prophet Muhammad provoked an outcry.
Thousands of Muslims have taken to the streets in protest at the caricatures, the newspaper that published them has received death threats, and two of its cartoonists have been forced into hiding.
Denmark’s leading daily, Jyllands-Posten, defied Islam’s ban on images of the prophet by printing cartoons by 12 different artists.
In one he is depicted as a saber wielding terrorist accompanied by women in burqas, in another his turban appears to be a bomb, and in a third he is portrayed as a schoolboy by a blackboard.
The ambassadors of 11 Muslim countries called on Prime Minister Rasmussen to take “necessary steps” against the “defamation of Islam.”
But Mr. Rasmussen, the head of a center-right minority coalition dependent for its survival on support from an anti-foreigner party, called the cartoons a “necessary provocation” and refused to act.
“I will never accept that respect for a religious stance leads to the curtailment of criticism, humor and satire in the press,” he said.
The Danish debate over how to integrate Muslims has raged for years, with nursery school menus and women-only opening hours for swimming pools particular battlegrounds. But the cartoons satirizing the prophet have injected a dangerous new element into the controversy.
“This is a pubescent demonstration of freedom of expression that consciously and totally without reason has trampled over the feelings of many people,” a former foreign minister and member of Mr. Rasmussen’s party, Uffe Ellemann Jensen, said.
The editor of Jyllands-Posten, Carsten Juste, spurned demands that he apologize, saying he “would not dream” of saying sorry.
“To demand that we take religious feelings into consideration is irreconcilable with western democracy and freedom of expression,” he said. “This doesn’t mean that we want to insult any Muslims.”
Mr. Juste commissioned the cartoons after learning of the difficulties a children’s writer, Kare Bluitgen, had in finding an illustrator for his book on the Koran and the Prophet’s life. Mr. Bluitgen said all the artists he approached feared the wrath of Muslims if they drew images of Muhammad.
Many cited the murder of the Dutch filmmaker Theo Van Gogh by an Islamist as a reason for refusal.
Mr. Juste said he wanted to counter growing “self censorship” and see how many cartoonists would be “bold enough” to draw the Prophet.
One artist, Franz Fuchsel, said he intended no offense. “But I live in 2005, not 905 and I use my quill in the way that Danish law allows me.”
Ayaan Hirsi Ali, a Dutch member of parliament famous for her criticism of Islam and author of the screenplay for Mr. Van Gogh’s film “Submission,” supported the paper Thursday.
“It’s necessary to taunt Muslims on their relationship with Muhammad,” she said.
“Otherwise we will never have the dialogue we need to establish with Muslims on the most central question: ‘Do you really feel that every Muslim in 2005 should follow the way of life the prophet had 1,400 years ago, as the Koran dictates?'”