London Flight Sent Back After U.S. Denies Entry

This article is from the archive of The New York Sun before the launch of its new website in 2022. The Sun has neither altered nor updated such articles but will seek to correct any errors, mis-categorizations or other problems introduced during transfer.

The New York Sun

LONDON – A British Airways flight from London to New York was forced to turn back yesterday after American authorities refused to allow one of the passengers to land, saying he posed a terrorist threat, the airline said.


Flight BA175 was three hours into its journey to John F. Kennedy International Airport when it was forced to turn back to London’s Heathrow Airport, where the passenger was met by police.


U.S. Transportation Security Administration spokeswoman Yolanda Clark said the passenger was traveling on a French passport.


The TSA said the man was a positive match with an anti-terrorism watch list.


London’s Metropolitan Police said they were questioning the man but had not arrested him. The TSA determined that British Airways followed proper procedures in checking the man’s name against the no-fly list. It was only after the plane took off that the airline sent the passenger manifest to U.S. Customs and Border Protection, which matched the name against the list.


“The flight returned to Heathrow after we received a request from the U.S. authorities saying that a passenger aboard the aircraft was not to be allowed to land in New York,” an airline spokesman said. “We stress that there was no threat to the safety of the aircraft.” Passengers were rescreened, and the plane took off again for New York, British Airways spokesman Honor Verrier said.


It is standard procedure for international flights leaving for America to send their passenger manifests after the plane takes off, but the American government wants to change that practice so the manifests are sent beforehand.


A federal official, speaking on condition of anonymity, said it appears the passenger was not initially discovered because the airline did not have the latest version of the no-fly list. The distribution system changed recently and the passenger was added to the list in late December, the official said.


The New York Sun

© 2024 The New York Sun Company, LLC. All rights reserved.

Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. The material on this site is protected by copyright law and may not be reproduced, distributed, transmitted, cached or otherwise used.

The New York Sun

Sign in or  create a free account

By continuing you agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use