Biden’s Blind Spot: Government Should Reward Success
This article is from the archive of The New York Sun before the launch of its new website in 2022. The Sun has neither altered nor updated such articles but will seek to correct any errors, mis-categorizations or other problems introduced during transfer.
Lots of rumors are being bandied about as to what’s in and what’s out on both spending and taxes. So far as we know, as Hillary Vaughn reported, there is no deal. My sources, who are smack inside Republican Senate and House leadership, tell me we are weeks away and even then no one knows about that.
As Hillary reported this afternoon, the chairman of the House Ways and Means Committee, Richard Neal, said the so-called wealth tax is out of the bill. Of course, it was knocked out this summer, then it came back, and now it’s knocked out again. Good. Very good.
Let’s pause a moment. The progressive left Democrats cannot help themselves. They’re like moths drawn to a flame. They cannot help themselves. It is a perfect example of the philosophy of the current Democratic Party that says: punish success. Successful people are bad, evil, a scourge to society.
The big-government, socialist Democrats have no interest in jobs, wages, family incomes for typical middle class blue collar Americans. They could care less about economic growth. They’re interested only in redistribution, taking from Peter to pay Paul.
Democratic tax policy wants to soak successful individuals and businesses, large and small, because Democrats oppose success and simply want to raise money for welfare entitlement purposes. Welfare dependency is their mantra. Welfare dependency without any workfare. This is an old school socialist view.
They want equity, which we used to call equality. They want equal results, not just equal opportunity. Like in the old Soviet Union and socialist governments everywhere, these policies would make everyone equally poor — except for the politically favored nomenklatura. Sound familiar? Leftwing experts ruling over the swamp? Just saying.
Now back to the billionaire’s tax. First of all, the vast majority of the billionaires were not billionaires when they started out in their garages, or wherever. They made a bet. They took a risk, usually with a small pile of money. And as they exercised their God-given talents, they gave us another economic revolution — led by new technology advances.
Now this backwards bill sponsored by Senator Ron Wyden would actually tax so-called billionaires from the day their assets started appreciating. When they weren’t wealthy and their stock was worthless, and so was their business.
That’s monumentally wrong. Then there’s the issue that, year in and year out, the list of richest people changes. It changes a lot. IRS studies of the so-called fortunate 400 show that 71% of the very rich qualify for the list only once. Courtesy of the Tax Foundation, this point regarding the top 400 taxpayers.
If this goofy idea ever went into place, the IRS would be shooting at a moving target. By the way, it’s not just billionaires. It’s defined as those who earn more than 100 million in three consecutive years. Beware, that number will be coming down, lower and lower.
The IRS believes we’re all guilty of hiding information in our bank accounts. The other problem is mark-to-market values often go up and they often come right back down. The wealthiest tend to have their wealth from the sale of capital assets or the sale of private business. As markets fluctuate, so would their taxable value under this regime.
We used to believe that capital investments turn to taxable income when there is a transaction to sell. Even that is subject to constitutional interpretation over differing definitions of wealth and income.
Finally, I want to remind that these billionaires have created literally tens of millions of jobs. This has led to higher wages and greater family incomes. In America we used to believe that you could start a business at home around some crazy idea that no one believes in and then you keep at it and it becomes a phenomenal good or service.
Like maybe a small cell phone or computer or medical procedure, or medical equipment, or even therapies and vaccines to save America. Those who succeeded way back before they got rich should be praised as the entrepreneurial backbone of the free enterprise American economy. We used to think that way. This is the land of opportunity.
One thing my two presidential bosses knew is that government policies should reward success, not punish it. They knew that incentives mattered. If it pays more to work, invest, innovate, invent etc., they will do so. If it pays less, they won’t. We used to understand that a good-paying job requires a solid healthy business. If you penalize the business through higher taxes, it will fail.
So will the workforce. Or if the business reaches out to investors but we heavily tax capital, then they won’t take risks, and there won’t be a healthy new business, and there won’t be a prospering new workforce delivering higher and higher incomes to their families. Which is why I keep saying, save America. Kill the bill.
________
From Mr. Kudlow’s broadcast on Fox News.