FEC Audit Eyes Spending by DeLay Fund-Raising PAC
This article is from the archive of The New York Sun before the launch of its new website in 2022. The Sun has neither altered nor updated such articles but will seek to correct any errors, mis-categorizations or other problems introduced during transfer.

WASHINGTON – A political committee founded by House Majority Leader Tom DeLay may have improperly spent unregulated “soft money” on get-out-the-vote and fund-raising activities, the Federal Election Commission says. A DeLay attorney said yesterday the money has been reimbursed.
Americans for a Republican Majority Political Action Committee “potentially” spent about $203,000 in soft money from its non-federal account to pay for the political activities and administrative expenses, the FEC found in an audit.
ARMPAC has federal and nonfederal accounts that shared certain expenses. The federal account could contain only money subject to federal contribution limits and from individuals and PACs. The non-federal account was not subject to federal regulations and could include soft money, which can include contributions from corporations and labor unions.
The FEC audit also found that Mr. DeLay’s committee failed to report more than $300,000 in debts owed to 25 vendors and erroneously reported its finances. DeLay attorney Donald Mc-Gahn said debts were paid but not in the time prescribed by the FEC. The expenses including spending on eight fundraising events, two each held at Four Streams Golf Club in Bealsville, Md., and Puerto Rico and others in Orlando, Fla., California, New York, and Hackberry Creek Country Club in Irving, Texas.
“Everything in this audit is accounting issues,” Mr. McGahn said. The committee has filed amended reports and taken other steps recommended by the FEC, the audit said.
The Federal Election Commission has the option of pursuing enforcement action against Americans for a Republican Majority Political Action Committee, but the report didn’t indicate whether it would. Bob Biersak, an FEC spokesman, said an audit is not an enforcement action. He said similar audits of political committees have been done on occasion.
The audit was posted on the Web site of PoliticalMoneyLine.com, which tracks political fund-raising and spending. Its contents were made available earlier to ARMPAC officials, who filed corrected reports in May and June.
A spokesman for Mr. DeLay referred calls to his attorneys.
ARMPAC’s executive director, James Ellis, was indicted in Texas in connection with a separate DeLay-connected committee, Texans for a Republican Majority. In that case, Mr. Ellis is charged with money laundering in connection with contributions for 2002 state legislative campaigns. Mr. DeLay has not been accused of any wrongdoing in the case. He has called the investigation a political witch hunt.
District Attorney Ronald Earle declined comment. ARMPAC records were subpoenaed by the grand jury for the investigation.
Watchdog groups said the FEC audit raises questions whether similar activities were occurring with the Texas committee, which also had an account for limited, individual contributions and one for corporate, unlimited money.
“Is this the tip of the iceberg? We don’t know,” said the president of Washington-based Judicial Watch, Thomas Fitton.
The groups also questioned whether ARMPAC soft money assisted Texas campaigns. ARMPAC contributions totaling $24,000 were given to Texas Republican legislative candidates in 2002.The checks sent to them included Mr. DeLay’s name and title as the PAC’s chairman.
DeLay attorney Mr. McGahn scoffed at the attempts to link the audit to the Texas case.
“They are reading an esoteric, minutiae question about overhead ratios that has been concocted by the FEC, that is no longer the law … into a whole ‘nother entity in Texas. And I’m going to wear tinfoil on my head so they can’t hear my thoughts,” Mr. McGahn said. “This has nothing to do with the Texas situation.”