Landmark Gender Equity Decision Faces Tough Test
This article is from the archive of The New York Sun before the launch of its new website in 2022. The Sun has neither altered nor updated such articles but will seek to correct any errors, mis-categorizations or other problems introduced during transfer.
WASHINGTON – The Supreme Court yesterday considered whether a landmark gender equity law shields people who report discrimination, hearing the case of an Alabama girl’s basketball coach who was fired after complaining that the boys were treated better.
In a case testing the scope of the Title IX law, Roderick Jackson used the statute as the basis for a lawsuit against the Birmingham Board of Education, claiming wrongful termination.
Mr. Jackson lost his coaching job in 2001 after repeatedly asking Birmingham school officials to provide his team a regulation-size gym with basketball rims that weren’t bent – just like the boys’ team had. He remained on the payroll as a teacher.
Lawyers for the board contend that if the justices side with Mr. Jackson it will open the door to a flood of litigation.
Title IX prohibits gender discrimination in public and private schools that receive federal funding, which almost all do. It covers admissions, recruitment, course offerings, counseling, financial aid, student health, and housing, as well as athletics.
At issue is whether Congress intended to allow lawsuits by people – regardless of their sex – who say they were punished for pointing out gender bias.
The court appeared split along ideological lines.
Justice Ginsburg – who was joined at times by liberal colleagues David Souter, John Paul Stevens and Stephen Breyer – pressed Birmingham School Board lawyer Kenneth Thomas on whether bias complaints would be fully aired if coaches and teachers could be fired without recourse.
When Mr. Thomas replied that plenty of complaints are reported and resolved voluntarily, Justice Ginsburg interrupted.
“To say ‘trust me’ is not an answer,” she said, contending that discrimination victims often “call and call and get no response.”
But Justice Scalia said expanding Title IX protections when the statute is silent on issues like Mr. Jackson’s would be unfair. “In other statutes, when Congress does create a cause of action, it goes out of its way to create a cause of action for retaliation,” he said.
