Mukasey To Argue Case at High Court
This article is from the archive of The New York Sun before the launch of its new website in 2022. The Sun has neither altered nor updated such articles but will seek to correct any errors, mis-categorizations or other problems introduced during transfer.
WASHINGTON — Attorney General Mukasey will argue a case before the Supreme Court this month, honoring a custom that his two predecessors ignored.
Mr. Mukasey will be the first attorney general since Janet Reno in 1996 to represent the government at the high court. Neither of President Bush’s first two attorneys general, John Ashcroft and Alberto Gonzales, argued a case at the court.
Mr. Mukasey will ask the justices on March 25 to reinstate the conviction of would-be millennium bomber Ahmed Ressam on a charge that an appeals court threw out, a Justice Department spokesman, Peter Carr, said.
The Mr. Mukasey, 66, is a former federal judge who presided over high-profile terrorism trials in New York.
The San Francisco-based 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals overturned just one of the nine counts on which Mr. Ressam was convicted for plotting to bomb Los Angeles International Airport around January 1, 2000. The charge in question is carrying explosives during the commission of another serious crime.
The appeals court said the law required prosecutors to show the explosives were carried “in relation to” the felony, which in this case was lying on a Customs form.
Mr. Mukasey will urge the justices to reverse the appeals court, in part because the ruling could make it harder to prosecute terrorists. The government argues that the law means a defendant must be carrying the explosives at the same time as he commits another crime.
Mr. Ressam’s lawyer, Tom Hillier, said Mr. Mukasey’s involvement “doesn’t change the question before the court.”
“Same case, same facts,” Mr. Hillier, the federal public defender in Seattle, said. “Attorney General Mukasey has had a distinguished career as a federal judge and before that as a prosecutor. He’ll do a great job. He knows his stuff.”
Ms. Reno was on the winning end of the case in which she argued, in support of Maryland, that police can order passengers and drivers to get out of vehicles during traffic stops.
Attorney General Griffin Bell did not fare as well when he took on a controversial case in the Carter administration. Mr. Bell argued unsuccessfully against letting an endangered fish, the tiny snail darter, stop a federal dam project.
