Petraeus, Crocker To Warn Against Changing Strategy
This article is from the archive of The New York Sun before the launch of its new website in 2022. The Sun has neither altered nor updated such articles but will seek to correct any errors, mis-categorizations or other problems introduced during transfer.

WASHINGTON – President Bush’s top two military and political advisers on Iraq will warn Congress on Monday that making any significant changes to the current war strategy will jeopardize the limited security and political progress made so far.
American Ambassador Ryan Crocker, who has been less forthcoming than General David Petraeus in advance of his testimony, will join Mr. Petraeus in pushing for maintaining the American troop surge, seeing it as the only viable option to prevent Iraq and the region from plunging into further chaos, American officials said.
Messrs. Crocker and Petraeus planned to meet tomorrow to go over their remarks and responses to expected tough questioning from lawmakers — including skeptical Republicans. But they will not consult Mr. Bush or their immediate bosses before their appearances Monday and Tuesday, in order to preserve the “independence and the integrity of their testimony,” said one official.
Messrs. Petraeus and Crocker did have lengthy discussions with the president, Defense Secretary Gates and Secretary of State Rice when Mr. Bush visited Iraq on Labor Day.
Mr. Crocker, a career diplomat with extensive experience in the Middle East who opposed the war when it began in 2003, is pushing for political change where progress has been elusive and the administration’s options are limited under the fragile Shiite-led government of Prime Minister al-Maliki.
Yet the diplomat will say that as poorly as Mr. al-Maliki’s government has performed, it would not be advisable at the moment for America to support new leadership or lobby for a different coalition of Iraq’s fractious Shiites, Sunnis, and Kurds, the officials said.
Mr. Crocker also will discuss the challenges of corruption, reconciliation, de-Baathification, and the difficulties of enacting wide-ranging legislation such as an oil law, according to officials. They spoke on condition of anonymity because they were discussing internal deliberations.
Both Messrs. Crocker and Petraeus will say the buildup of 30,000 troops, bringing the current American total to nearly 170,000, has achieved some success and is working better than any previous effort to quell the insurgency and restore stability, according to officials familiar with their thinking.
Mr. Petraeus, the commander of American forces in Iraq, and Mr. Crocker were in the Washington area today working separately on final drafts of opening testimony on Capitol Hill. Later in the week, Mr. Bush plans a national address.
The assessments by Messrs. Petraeus and Crocker are intended to be considered equally. But officials expect Congress to focus on military matters, particularly possible troop withdrawals. Unless there are changes, the increase comes to a natural end starting in the spring and continuing through the end of next summer.
At the same time, officials close to Mr. Crocker pointed out that any revisions to the military strategy will have a profound affect on the political side.
“Clearly, the political, economic and diplomatic elements are directly related to what happens with security and our involvement in it,” one official said.
The officials disputed suggestions that either Messrs. Petraeus or Crocker would recommend anything more than a symbolic reduction in troop levels and then only in the spring.
Mr. Petraeus offered some insights into his testimony yesterday. In a letter to troops serving in Iraq, he cited “uneven” but quantifiable progress in the security situation and acknowledged that the political side “has not worked out as we had hoped.”
“We are, in short, a long way from the goal line, but we do have the ball and we are driving down the field,” he wrote. It was perhaps the clearest indication he favors carrying on with the troop increase.
Officials said Mr. Crocker is focused on trying to do the best he can with the tools available to him now before completing his tour in Baghdad and retiring. More is at stake for Mr. Petraeus because he is believed to have higher ambitions, including possibly elected office.
In their testimony, the two will lay out for Congress the situation on the ground, discuss the merits of possible revisions to Mr. Bush’s strategy, including troop drawdowns and a reduction in support for embattled Mr. al-Maliki and conclude that such changes are unwise, officials said.
The testimony will set the stage for an announcement by Mr. Bush on how he will proceed in the face of widespread public unhappiness with the war and criticism from congressional Democrats, especially senators seeking the party’s 2008 presidential nomination.
Messrs. Petraeus and Crocker previewed their thoughts to Mr. Bush during his stop in Anbar province last Monday. It is one of several regions where the administration has claimed success with the additional troops, with decisions by local leaders to join with American forces against insurgents, the officials said.
To that end, the presidential advisers will press lawmakers to recognize achievements at the local level and argue that such results will force Iraq’s national leaders into action.
But that development is not covered by any of the 18 military and political benchmarks Congress set out for judging the effectiveness when it approved the new policy that was announced by Mr. Bush in January and reached its full strength in July.
In their testimony, Messrs. Petraeus and Crocker are expected to repeat the assertions made in the White House’s July report that progress is being made, official said. A new updated report is due September 15.
They also are expected to make the oft-stated case that an independent report by congressional auditors, who found only three of 18 benchmarks fully met, set unfair standards for judging success, the officials said.