Red Cross Board Was ‘Kidding Itself,’ A Member Warned Before Katrina
This article is from the archive of The New York Sun before the launch of its new website in 2022. The Sun has neither altered nor updated such articles but will seek to correct any errors, mis-categorizations or other problems introduced during transfer.

WASHINGTON – The American Red Cross was warned years before Katrina hit to resolve its internal disputes or risk a repeat of snafus that plagued the September 11, 2001, relief effort, according to internal documents made public by a Senate panel yesterday.
Thousands of pages of Red Cross email, corporate documents, and whistleblower complaints paint a picture of an organization whose mammoth structure contributed to the charity’s uneven response to Hurricane Katrina.
In an October 29, 2001, e-mail, board member Bill George warned Red Cross chairman David McLaughlin to resolve the group’s disputes. At the time, the nation’s largest charity was reeling from CEO Bernadine Healy’s resignation amid charges it had mismanaged September 11 donations.
“The worst thing we could do is to gloss over the split on the board, make some superficial changes in governance, and see the whole scenario repeated three or four years from now,” the Medtronic Incorporated executive wrote.
“I do not think the board can continue kidding itself that it wants a strong leader and then not giving that person the authority to lead,” he said. Four years later, the group’s next CEO, Marsha Evans, would resign in the aftermath of Katrina, citing board friction.
Senator Grassley, a Republican of Iowa, calling for immediate changes, warned the Red Cross board yesterday that “‘business-as-usual’ cannot continue.” He said the documents raise questions about the Red Cross’s ability to keep close watch on billions of dollars in donations.
“This type of culture, a culture that discourages people from coming forward, management that does not want to hear the bad news, and is more concerned about good press than good results, is a theme that I am hearing too often,” said Mr. Grassley, who as Finance Committee chairman oversees charitable organizations.
His committee released the documents yesterday.
In a statement, the Red Cross said it would fully cooperate with the committee’s review. The charity has said it responded to Katrina the best it could in circumstances almost unimaginable, while acknowledging that it stumbled in “technology, logistics, and coordination.”
“The American Red Cross is committed to learning from our prior challenges and making the necessary changes,” the charity said yesterday, noting it had recently launched an independent audit to review operations.
A House report earlier this month on the Katrina response found the Red Cross was overwhelmed by water, food and supply shortages as well as a disorganized shelter process. Some lawmakers have called for a change to the national response plan that gives the Red Cross the primary role and the dollars that flow with it.
Replying to a Senate inquiry, the Red Cross said this month it was working to improve coordination with FEMA and local charity groups.
It said it had no “fixed deadline” for hiring a new CEO to replace Ms. Evans, who took over in August 2002 as the organization was shaking off criticism over how it handled September 11 donations, some of which were quietly set aside for future terror incidents.
In dozens of letters to Mr. Grassley’s office, former Red Cross employees and volunteers detail a culture of inefficiency in which poor communications, layers of bureaucracy and resistance to change contributed to waste and chaos after Katrina struck.