Sealed Documents Obscure Senator’s Record as First Lady

This article is from the archive of The New York Sun before the launch of its new website in 2022. The Sun has neither altered nor updated such articles but will seek to correct any errors, mis-categorizations or other problems introduced during transfer.

The New York Sun

LITTLE ROCK, Ark. — Senator Clinton touts her experience as one reason voters should make her president, but nearly 2 million pages of documents covering her White House years are locked up in a building here, obscuring a large swath of her record as first lady.

Mrs. Clinton’s calendars, appointment logs, and memos are stored at her husband’s presidential library, in the custody of federal archivists who do not expect them to be released until after the 2008 presidential election.

A trove of records has been made public detailing the Clinton White House’s attempts to remake the nation’s health care system, following a request from President Clinton that those materials be released first. Mrs. Clinton led the health care effort in 1993 and 1994.

But even in the health care documents, at least 1,000 pages involving her work has been censored by archives staff because they include confidential advice and must be kept secret under the federal Presidential Records Act. Political consultants said that if Mrs. Clinton’s records were made public, rivals would mine them for scraps of information that might rattle her campaign.

“Those files — that’s the mother lode of opposition research,” said Ray McNally, a Republican political consultant in Sacramento, Calif. “Opposition researchers would be very hungry to see what’s there.”

Robert Shrum, senior political strategist in Senator Kerry’s 2004 presidential campaign, said: “In 2 million pieces of paper, would opposition researchers hope to find one where she wrote a memo saying, ‘I wish I’d never gotten involved in health care?’ Sure. That’s what they’d love to find.”

At the Clinton library overlooking the Arkansas River, federal archivists are sorting through 80 million pages of records and another 20 million e-mails from a Bill Clinton presidency that ended in January 2001. About 2 million of those pages concern the first lady’s office.

A staff of 11 spends most of its time answering some 250 requests for documents submitted under the Freedom of Information Act. Requests are fulfilled largely on a first-come basis. Because the earliest requests involved other Clinton administration activities, the requests for the now-New York senator’s records are back in line, staff members said.

A list of Freedom of Information Act requests that have been completed by the archives staff includes one for a photo of Bill Clinton jogging with a “Yale Whiffenpoof Club insignia” on his clothing; another for various files on UFOs and flying saucers,” and one for the full name of the pastry chef who made a birthday cake for Chelsea Clinton.

Before documents are released, archives staff must read them and, by law, must redact material that they determine contains classified information, invades a person’s privacy, discloses trade secrets, discloses confidential advice from presidential advisers, or raises other concerns specified in the records law. Asked how long it might be before Mrs. Clinton’s records are released, the library’s chief archivist said it could take years.

“We’re processing as fast as we can,” Melissa Walker said.

Not fast enough, in the view of some who have been waiting. A conservative watchdog group called Judicial Watch filed suit against the National Archives in July demanding the release of Mrs. Clinton’s diaries, telephone logs, daily planners, and schedules. In the 1990s, the group filed suits against the Clinton administration that led to information about fund-raising practices, including Democratic campaign donors being tapped for official trade missions. In the most recent suit, Judicial Watch said it had submitted its request more than a year ago and had received nothing, save for confirmation that the library possessed “a substantial volume” of such papers.

Staffing pressures have prevented the National Archives from keeping up with an expanding workload. In 2002, the agency employed 334 archivists. This year, the number is down to 301.

But advocates for open records said that had it made savvier use of technology, the Clinton library could be moving more quickly. Computers can sort through email to flag classified documents, as distinguished from material that can be speedily released, said Thomas Blanton, director of the National Security Archive, a research institute at George Washington University.

“There’s no reason why a load of a few hundred FOIA requests should absorb 11 full-time people perpetually,” Mr. Blanton said, referring to requests made under the Freedom of Information Act.

What records that have been made public offer tantalizing details about Mrs. Clinton’s White House years. One memo shows details about the health care plan’s “war room.” Aides wrote of the need for secrecy but also presented Mrs. Clinton with arguments she could make that the process of drawing up a health care plan was “the most open in the history of the federal government.”

A 1993 memo discussed a plan to createreportsonmembersofCongress, tracking their positions on health care. The files would log when members met with Mrs. Clinton, how they voted on key bills and — under a category called “influence” — whom they consulted for advice. One 1994 memo offers a historical curiosity: It draws Mrs. Clinton’s attention to a rising Republican politician, Mitt Romney, who is now a leading contender for the Republican presidential nomination.

In the memo, Mrs. Clinton’s aides discussed a trip to Boston, where the then-first lady was to appear at a fund-raising event for Senator Kennedy, a Democrat of Massachusetts. Mr. Kennedy was then running for re-election against Mr. Romney.

“Romney, a millionaire business consultant with no political experience, is a Mormon,” the memo reads. “His religion is a delicate issue, which Kennedy himself has not raised but other Democrats have.”


The New York Sun

© 2025 The New York Sun Company, LLC. All rights reserved.

Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. The material on this site is protected by copyright law and may not be reproduced, distributed, transmitted, cached or otherwise used.

The New York Sun

Sign in or  Create a free account

or
By continuing you agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use