Senate Approves Renewal Of USA Patriot Act
This article is from the archive of The New York Sun before the launch of its new website in 2022. The Sun has neither altered nor updated such articles but will seek to correct any errors, mis-categorizations or other problems introduced during transfer.

WASHINGTON – The Senate yesterday gave its blessing to the renewal of the USA Patriot Act after adding new privacy protections designed to strike a better balance between civil liberties and the government’s power to root out terrorists.
The 89-10 vote marked a bright spot in President Bush’s troubled second term as his approval ratings dipped over the war in Iraq and his administration’s response to Hurricane Katrina. Renewing the act, Bush and congressional Republicans said, was key to preventing more terror attacks in America.
Mr. Bush applauded the Senate for overcoming “partisan attempts to block its passage.” The House was expected to approve the two-bill package next week and send it to the president, who would sign it before 16 provisions expire March 10.
“This bill will allow our law enforcement officials to continue to use the same tools against terrorists that are already used against drug dealers and other criminals, while safeguarding the civil liberties of the American people,” Mr. Bush said in a statement from India.
Critics held their ground. A December filibuster led by Senator Feingold, a Democrat of Wisconsin, and joined by several libertarian-leaning Republicans, forced the Bush administration to agree to modest new curbs on the government’s power to probe library, bank and other records.
Mr. Feingold insisted those new protections are cosmetic.
“Americans want to defeat terrorism and they want the basic character of this country to survive and prosper,” he said. “They want both security and liberty, and unless we give them both – and we can if we try – we have failed.”
Some lawmakers who voted for the package acknowledged deep reservations about the power it would grant to any president.
“Our support for the Patriot Act does not mean a blank check for the president,” said Democratic leader Harry Reid of Nevada, who voted to pass the bill package. “What we tried to do on a bipartisan basis is have a better bill. It has been improved.”
Not enough even for the bill’s chief sponsor in the Senate, Judiciary Committee Chairman Arlen Specter, a Re publican of Pennsylvania. After prolonged negotiations produced a House-Senate compromise, Mr. Specter urged his colleagues to pass it even as he promised to introduce a new measure and hold hearings on how to fix it.
For now, Mr. Bush and his Republican allies savored a significant victory. For months, their tough-on-terror image has been tarnished by the revelation that the president authorized a secret domestic wiretapping program. The report in December gave Democrats ammunition for their charge that the Bush administration had run amok in its zeal to root out terrorists.
With the help of some Republicans, they blocked a vote on whether to renew the law before 16 provisions expired on December 31.
GOP leaders were unable to break the gridlock, so Congress opted instead to extend the deadline twice while negotiations continued. In the end, the White House and the Republicans broke the stalemate by crafting a second measure that would curb some powers of law enforcement officials seeking information. Both will be sent as a package to Mr. Bush.
Passed in the weeks after the September 11, 2001, terrorist attacks, the original Patriot Act expanded the government’s surveillance and prosecutorial powers against suspected terrorists, their associates and financiers.
Mr. Feingold’s chief ally, Senator Byrd, a Democrat of West Virginia, said the package was not enough to check what he described as a presidential tendency through history of “always grabbing more power.”
“The erosion of freedom rarely comes as an all-out frontal assault,” warned Mr. Byrd, the dean of the Senate. “Rather, it is a gradual, noxious creeping cloaked in secrecy and glossed over by reassurances of greater security.”
The “no” votes came from Jim Jeffords, an Independent of Vermont, and Messrs. Feingold, Byrd and seven other Senate Democrats: Daniel Akaka of Hawaii, Jeff Bingaman of New Mexico, Tom Harkin of Iowa, Patrick Leahy of Vermont, Carl Levin of Michigan, Patty Murray of Washington and Ron Wyden of Oregon.
Senator Inouye, a Democrat of Hawaii, did not vote.