Supreme Court Backs Ex-Playmate’s Effort

This article is from the archive of The New York Sun before the launch of its new website in 2022. The Sun has neither altered nor updated such articles but will seek to correct any errors, mis-categorizations or other problems introduced during transfer.

The New York Sun

WASHINGTON (AP) – The Supreme Court ruled Monday that one-time stripper and Playboy Playmate Anna Nicole Smith can pursue part of her late husband’s oil fortune.


Justices were unanimous in giving new legal life to Smith’s bid to collect millions of dollars from the estate of J. Howard Marshall II, which has been estimated at as much as $1.6 billion.


Smith has been embroiled in a long running cross-country court fight with Marshall’s youngest son, E. Pierce Marshall. The court’s decision means that it will likely not end anytime soon _ although there is no guarantee she will collect any money.


Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg said in the opinion that a Texas court did not have the last word when it ruled against the blonde reality television star.


“This is just another battle in a very long war,” said Douglas Baird, a bankruptcy expert at the University of Chicago.


The ruling gives federal courts more authority to resolve disputes that arise out of estates.


Justice John Paul Stevens wrote a separate opinion to say that he would have given federal courts more jurisdiction. He said Smith’s appeal was “an easy case.”


Smith was a 26-year-old topless dancer when she married Marshall, then 89, in 1994. He died the following year, setting off an intense family fight.


At issue for the justices was competing court jurisdiction. A Texas court held a five-month trial before deciding that Smith was entitled to nothing from Marshall’s estate. Smith brought a separate claim in federal court in California.


Justices said Monday that the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals was wrong in ruling that federal courts could not handle Smith’s case.


Smith, the spokeswoman for a diet products company, had been awarded $474 million by a federal bankruptcy judge. That was later reduced by a federal district judge and then thrown out altogether by the San Francisco-based 9th Circuit. The case now goes back to California.


“I will continue to fight to uphold my father’s estate plan,” Pierce Marshall said Monday.


Ginsburg noted that there are several pending issues that could still keep Smith from collecting any money.


Before his death Marshall showered Smith with $6.6 million in gifts that included two homes, expensive jewelry and clothes. She contends that he also promised her half his estate.


Ginsburg’s opinion, and announcement from the bench, included only a hint of the nastiness of the family feud. She said there were accusations that Pierce Marshall “engaged in forgery, fraud, and overreaching to gain control of his father’s assets” and, on the other side, that Smith had defamed her former stepson.


Pierce Marshall said in a statement that he would “fight to clear my name in California federal court. That is a promise that (Smith) and her lawyers can take to the bank.”


Smith’s case had brought unusual drama to the normally sedate high court.


Dressed in all black, she wept in the courtroom in late February as justices discussed Marshall and whether he had intended to provide for his young wife in death. When Smith arrived at the court, several photographers were knocked to the ground in a scuffle to take her picture.


The case is Marshall v. Marshall, 04-1544.


___


On the Net:


Supreme Court: http://www.supremecourtus.gov/


The New York Sun

© 2025 The New York Sun Company, LLC. All rights reserved.

Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. The material on this site is protected by copyright law and may not be reproduced, distributed, transmitted, cached or otherwise used.

The New York Sun

Sign in or  Create a free account

or
By continuing you agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use