White House Renominates Judges Some Deemed Too Conservative
This article is from the archive of The New York Sun before the launch of its new website in 2022. The Sun has neither altered nor updated such articles but will seek to correct any errors, mis-categorizations or other problems introduced during transfer.

WASHINGTON — The Bush administration, trying to push through judicial nominations before Republicans lose control of the Senate, resubmitted six nominees deemed by Democrats too conservative for the federal bench.
Five nominees were the subject of an angry exchange in August when Democrats said their selection was a sop to the president’s conservative base.
The White House yesterday submitted Terrence Boyle of North Carolina and William James Haynes II of Virginia to the 4th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in Richmond, Va.; Michael Brunson Wallace of Mississippi to the 5th Circuit in New Orleans; Peter Keisler of Maryland to the District of Columbia Circuit, and William Gerry Myers III and Norman Randy Smith, both of Idaho, for the 9th Circuit in San Francisco.
Everyone except Mr. Keisler has generated intense opposition from Democrats.
Under Senate rules the nominations must be resubmitted after Congress takes an extended break, as was the case this year for the 2006 election.
“Democrats have asked the president to be bipartisan, but this is a clear slap in the face at our request,” said Senator Schumer, a Democrat of New York and a member of the Judiciary Committee, said. “For the sake of the country, we hope that this is an aberration because the president feels he must placate his hard-right base, rather than an indication of things to come.”
Senator Cornyn, a Republican of Texas and vocal backer of many of Mr. Bush’s judicial picks, said he thought it would be “very tough” to get the nominees through the Senate during the lame-duck session. But, he added, “Hope springs eternal.”