Tina Brown on How We’ve Turned Into a Paranoid City
This article is from the archive of The New York Sun before the launch of its new website in 2022. The Sun has neither altered nor updated such articles but will seek to correct any errors, mis-categorizations or other problems introduced during transfer.

Among New York Democrats there’s a weird fatalism about John Kerry’s chances in November.The city’s mania to see President Bush routed does nothing to lift the mood of bullish defeatism.
If you go around the table at just about any opinionated dinner party what you hear is that Mr. Bush will win by a hair – not because Mr. Kerry still fails to rev the electorate’s engine but because “they” will “pull something.”
What “they” will “pull” ranges from the notion that “they” – sometimes known as “Karl Rove” – will produce Osama bin Laden from some luxury cave on Halloween to a super-scary election-eve imminent terror attack warning that would have all the authenticity of Orson Welles’s 1938 radio hoax about the Martians, but better production values.
On these premises, it is a given that the timing of the terror reports was sheer manipulation. Exhibit A is a photo in the takeout on terrorism in this week’s Newsweek. See that big picture of Fran Townsend, the White House’s homeland security adviser? In the background is Karl Rove.C’mon – what’s he doing at a terrorism meeting?
“I’ve heard people saying that the Bush team might blow up something around Election Day just like the Nazis burned the Reichstag and then blamed it on the Jews to get elected,” a writer friend e-mailed me this week. “The surprise is that it all comes from your above-average Timesreading academics.”
Are smart people going nuts?
Just when you think so, the news confirms overheated suspicions. The electronic voting machines are found vulnerable to hacking, and the habitually judicious Senator Clinton goes on record in Midtown Tuesday to charge the Republicans would try to intimidate Democratic voters and manipulate federal election laws to discourage turnout.
The summer of paranoia is building to a head just in time for the dreaded Republican convention. It’s all been too much to deal with for the com munications capital, aka the new Republic of Fear. First came an undeniably real conspiracy, September 11; then the long phantom pregnancy of Weapons of Mass Destruction.
Then the postwar recriminations and spin that bred a rash of new conspiracy theories, compounded now by the feeling that all the fake conspiracies only served to distract us from the real one that has resurfaced to haunt us today.
Scenarios of tourist choppers beheading the Statue of Liberty or limos loaded up with explosives instead of P. Diddy’s Hamptons’ houseguests are more vivid than the mild nail biting of the summer’s scare movies.
“Open Water” – the new shark pic – generates more fear for fewer dollars than the big-bucks movies like “The Day after Tomorrow” and “The Village” because it uses real sharks, unknown actors, and shaky cameras for its verite “Blair Fish Project” feeling.
Since September 11, our terror index knows that the lower the budget, the more horrifying the horror. Shaky cameras will forever conjure up the blurred footage of the hijackers passing through airport security cameras, box cutters nestled in their carry-on toilet cases Add to this the success of docuprop led by Michael Moore, who’s made conspiracy theories fresh and cool and viable again.
You don’t need fake movie chills when the big fat beach read is the September 11 Commission’s litany of lethal errors.
My paranoid theory is that Mr.Bush is laying these terrors off on the public as retaliation for the taunts about his own inaction during that fateful August of 2001, when Richard Clarke and George Tenet were running in and out of each other’s offices with their hair on fire and Bush rusticated in Crawford clearing brush.
Maybe now the presidential payback is “Wanna feel what it’s like to get a bunch of scary, contradictory, specific and nonspecific warnings about impending doom dumped on you when you ought to be on vacation? Try this one for size.”
The more extreme paranoia is about our need to conquer feelings of chaos by appointing someone to be in charge. It’s more comforting to believe in “They” than to accept the more troubling truth that our leaders are even more panicky than we are.
In the good old Oliver Stone days, we could credit the CIA with masterminding every plot to hijack America. Now we know the CIA can’t even mastermind who’s buying what and whom on Ahmad Chalabi’s MasterCard.
By way of retaliation, the press likes to torture Congress with those 500 pages and damning footnotes of the September 11 report.
Terrorists may not take vacations, we are forever being told, but sane people do. Condoleezza Rice will never ever again be able to rip up that hair and head for the beach.
We want our senators and congressmen to sit and swelter in the Capitol in sessions that will liquidate our fear. We want to deny them any time to digest or consider these dense proposals because before September 11 there was so much considering and digesting and diddling and dawdling. We want them to have migraines of tough-decision stress on our behalf now as they should have had then.
“Why not call Congress back to Washington right now to work on this report and guarantee that the reforms can be implemented to help our intelligence agencies?” Tim Russert demands of House Speaker Dennis Hastert, who’s only in the studio in the first place to publicize his book.
Ruining our leaders’ vacations may not be the cruelest blow the terrorists have struck, but it’s one of the most precise. Mr. Hastert’s pasty face over his tight shirt and necktie is confirmation of all the clambakes our nation’s leaders are now forced to miss.