Ohio Republicans Push Bill To Let Educators Teach ‘Positive Influence’ of Christianity in America

The sponsor of the bill says it is about ‘restoring honesty and depth to the way we teach’ history.

AP/Luis Andres Henao
Jean-Michel Gisnel prays with other congregants at the First Haitian Evangelical Church of Springfield, Ohio. AP/Luis Andres Henao

Republicans in Ohio want to allow educators in the state to teach the positive impacts of Christianity on America in public schools and charter schools.

Lawmakers in the state’s general assembly this week heard testimony in support of Ohio House Bill 486, known as the Charlie Kirk American Heritage Act. Its supporters say the bill would remove the “invisible shackles” on teachers, allowing them to provide “full transparency in the teaching of American history.”

The bill comes as Republican lawmakers in conservative states are increasingly pushing to infuse religious teaching and messaging in public schools. States such as Texas, Louisiana, and Arkansas recently passed laws requiring public schools to display the Ten Commandments, but those laws have been blocked by federal courts and are facing ongoing legal challenges.

One of the sponsors of the Ohio bill, a state representative, Gary Click, told lawmakers he has heard from teachers who feel the law currently prevents them from discussing Christianity’s impact on history. 

Mr. Click said, “This legislation allows Ohio’s educators, when teaching American history, to include instruction on the positive influence of religion — particularly Christianity — on the development of our nation’s ideals, its civic institutions, and its culture.”

“This is not about rewriting history. It is about restoring honesty and depth to the way we teach it,” he added.

Mr. Click said he named the bill after Charlie Kirk because he was “known for being a conservative, and Charlie Kirk was also known for being a Christian.”

“And Charlie often brought to light those historical facts from our history, and people didn’t like to hear that,” he said. 

Democrats took issue with the fact that the bill only mentions Christianity and no other religion. A Democratic representative, Beryl Brown Piccolantonio, said, “The religion part of the First Amendment has two parts to it: the freedom to exercise and the freedom from the government establishing any one religion. This bill only talks about Christianity, so I’m trying to sort out how this specific legislation would not violate the establishment clause.”

Mr. Click responded, “The reason it focuses directly on Christianity is because those are the complaints that I have received personally, is that people don’t feel comfortable teaching that.”

The legislature has considered other religious measures for public schools. Last week, lawmakers passed a bill that allows public and private schools to carry overdose reversal medication, which had an amendment added onto it that provided more flexibility for students to leave school in the middle of the day for religious instruction.


The New York Sun

© 2025 The New York Sun Company, LLC. All rights reserved.

Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. The material on this site is protected by copyright law and may not be reproduced, distributed, transmitted, cached or otherwise used.

The New York Sun

Sign in or  create a free account

or
By continuing you agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use