Clinton’s One Plausible Path

This article is from the archive of The New York Sun before the launch of its new website in 2022. The Sun has neither altered nor updated such articles but will seek to correct any errors, mis-categorizations or other problems introduced during transfer.

The New York Sun

Barack Obama won 11 out of 11 primaries and caucuses between Super Tuesday and February 19. Hillary Clinton won three out of four contests on March 4.

Suddenly, the look and feel of the Democratic presidential race is different. Yet the delegate count has changed hardly at all. Three victories in four states with 370 delegates netted Hillary Clinton only about a 20-delegate edge, leaving her still about 100 delegates behind. On the night that John McCain officially clinched the Republican nomination, the course of the Democratic race seemed less clear and more fraught with peril than ever.

Mrs. Clinton appeared confident and vibrant on primary night, while Mr. Obama’s graceful cadences sounded a little emptier than before. The storyline is changing, too. For the first time in a long campaign cycle, mainstream press have been pursuing stories that reflect badly on Mr. Obama: his close ties and property purchase with Chicago political operator Tony Rezko, now on trial in federal court; his chief economic adviser’s purported assurance to a Canadian diplomat that Mr. Obama doesn’t really mean he’ll ditch the North American Free Trade Agreement, as he was suggesting in trade-wary Ohio; Mr. Obama’s pastor’s recent award to the man Mr. Obama refers to as “Minister Farrakhan.”

Mr. McCain takes questions until the last reporter runs out of things to ask. Mr. Obama terminated a probing press conference last week after eight questions with the lame excuse that he was running late. Mr. Obama’s oratory has been compared to John Kennedy’s. But he doesn’t have Kennedy’s gift for gracefully parrying hostile questions.

The March 4 results suggest Mr. Obama may not turn out to be as strong a candidate against Mr. McCain this November as he is in current polls. Mrs. Clinton’s “red phone” ad asked which candidate you would want to rely on to respond to a crisis at three o’clock in the morning. Mr. Obama’s campaign said this was a Republican tactic.

Yes — but Walter Mondale ran a similar ad against Gary Hart in 1984. It worked then, and it worked now. In Texas, where the ad ran, Mrs. Clinton got a 60% to 39% margin among those who made up their minds in the last three days. That single ad may have made the difference in a contest she had to win to continue in the race.

In contrast, Mr. Obama’s demagoguery on trade failed to attract white working-class voters: He ran far behind Mrs. Clinton in Mahoning County (Youngstown) and the west side of Cuyahoga County (Cleveland). In southeast Ohio, settled originally by Virginians and still Southern-accented today, Mrs. Clinton carried all-white counties with 70% to 80% of the vote — more than she was carrying nearly all-white counties in central Texas. That raises doubts that Mr. Obama could run well in these counties, which provided critical votes in Bill Clinton’s wins in Ohio in the 1990s and Jimmy Carter’s narrow win there in 1976.

But Mrs. Clinton is still about 100 delegates behind, and the Democrats’ proportional representation rules make it impossible for her to close the gap in the remaining primaries.

Her only plausible path to the nomination is to win a majority of super-delegates and, perhaps, to reverse the party’s decision disqualifying the Michigan and Florida delegations — overruling the voters in one case and changing the rules after the game has been played in the other. This might pass muster if the national polls show an unambiguous and substantial move toward Mrs. Clinton. Otherwise, in more likely and ambiguous circumstances, a Clinton nomination will seem illegitimate to many who have been swooning over Mr. Obama and streaming into polling booths because he alone offers hope.

The March 4 exit polls show increasing percentages of Democratic primary voters unwilling to accept the rejection of their candidate. Both candidates have an incentive to attack on grounds that will weaken the other in the general election, as Mrs. Clinton has already started to do with her “red phone” ad.

All of this is a windfall, surely, for Mr. McCain — unless he forgets that his party is in trouble and that he needs to make an affirmative case for himself and his policies. And loudly enough to overcome the din as Mrs. Clinton and Mr. Obama pummel each other.


The New York Sun

© 2024 The New York Sun Company, LLC. All rights reserved.

Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. The material on this site is protected by copyright law and may not be reproduced, distributed, transmitted, cached or otherwise used.

The New York Sun

Sign in or  Create a free account

By continuing you agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use