Seizing the Bloody Shirt

White House strategists are no doubt pleased with themselves. Their late-August convention, timed as a kickoff to the fall campaign rather than the conventional capstone to the primary season, appears to have helped accelerate President Bush’s momentum.There are still two months to go, of course, and in politics that’s a lifetime. Mr. Bush’s loudly proclaimed status as the man best able to keep terrorism at bay could yet be tested, indeed, is quite likely to be tested. Democrats can also be relied upon to stir fears about Social Security, Medicare, and the environment.Moreover, voters will have the certain knowledge that second terms tend to be unfortunate affairs. And they will remember that in the 1990s, America flourished during a period of a divided government – the great economic boom having gotten under way in earnest after a Republican majority was installed in Congress in order to make sure that President Clinton hewed to his New Democratic promises.Many voters may reach instinctively for a similar arrangement. But the Republican National Convention also made clear the very large handicaps that Senator Kerry and the Democrats will be laboring under to take back the White House.Republicans reasserted ownership of the bloody shirt, hammering on the theme that Mr. Bush offered a steady, steely hand in the fight to bring the murderers of more than 2,700 Americans to justice. And they made a strong case that during Mr. Kerry’s 20 years in Congress, he was both a serial flip-flopper and a left-leaning ideologue.Mr. Kerry and his handlers are trying to handle the first problem by playing on fears that Mr. Bush has bungled the Iraq situation. Events may prove them right, though Iraq seems to be going a bit better now. But Republicans aren’t going to let voters forget that Mr. Kerry hasn’t yet managed to explain his various votes on the issue – in particular his 1991 vote against responding with military force against Saddam Hussein’s invasion of Kuwait.After all, in 1991 the first President Bush met all the conditions that Mr. Kerry now uses to justify his criticism of the second President Bush. America had the backing of all its allies, the United Nations, and a significant part of the Arab world. Saddam was manifestly threatening fundamental American interests in the Middle East. But Mr. Kerry still opposed American action. Go figure, the GOP can reasonably say.Republicans also will attempt to sever Mr. Kerry from the party of Mr. Clinton. Not incidentally did the GOP convention send in a Democrat, Senator Miller, to give the keynote address. It was an old-fashioned, barn-burning jeremiad of the sort that only a Democrat could convincingly deliver. And Mr. Miller forcefully connected Mr. Kerry to the unfortunate President Carter, a man who also seemed to have mixed emotions about American power.“They claimed Carter’s pacifism would lead to peace,” thundered Mr. Miller. “They were wrong.” Then, to even wilder cheers, Mr. Miller linked Mr. Kerry to that iconic liberal, Senator Kennedy. “No pair has been more wrong, more loudly, more often than the two senators from Massachusetts,” he cried.Message: This is not the man to bring back the good old days of President Clinton and the New Democrats. There may be an obvious inconsistency in the Republican attack: is Mr. Kerry an unprincipled flip-flopper, or is he a liberal ideologue? Never mind. The unfortunate fact for Democrats is that Republicans can go on painting him as both things, precisely because members of Congress must vote in so many different ways on so many different issues.Mr. Kerry’s utter lack of any distinguishing legislative agenda of his own – one reason the Democratic convention harped so insistently on his Vietnam service – makes it possible for Republicans to define him as each day seems to require.Mr. Bush has his own problems, of course. Democrats have landed some heavy blows on his Iraq venture; the economy, particularly in the industrial Midwest, still isn’t generating enough jobs to put Republicans in a comfort zone; the Patriot Act energizes the civil libertarians, as will last week’s embarrassing government admission that zealous prosecutors had withheld evidence in a high-profile Detroit terrorism case.But where only a few weeks ago the election looked like Mr. Kerry’s to lose, Republicans come out of their convention with the reasonable expectation that it’s now Mr. Bush’s to lose.

Seizing the Bloody Shirt

Seizing the Bloody Shirt

More from the New York Sun

Barack Obama’s Anti-Israel Era

When it Comes to Headphones, Nothing Matters

No Fracking, Free Health Insurance for Illegal Immigrants — Is That Really Affordability?

FIFA Agrees To Reassess Trump Peace Prize as Infantino’s Presidency Crumbles

Emergency Response Times Soar by 15 Minutes at New York City as EMTs Abandon the Profession

Obama Admin Put El-Sayed’s Sister-in-Law on Terror Watch List

Gorsuch Allies With Sotomayor To Denounce Trump Administration’s Prosecutions of Illegal Immigrant

Kristin Scott Thomas Once Again Shows How Chekhov Is Done

More from the New York Sun

Barack Obama’s Anti-Israel Era

When it Comes to Headphones, Nothing Matters

No Fracking, Free Health Insurance for Illegal Immigrants — Is That Really Affordability?

FIFA Agrees To Reassess Trump Peace Prize as Infantino’s Presidency Crumbles

Emergency Response Times Soar by 15 Minutes at New York City as EMTs Abandon the Profession

Obama Admin Put El-Sayed’s Sister-in-Law on Terror Watch List

Gorsuch Allies With Sotomayor To Denounce Trump Administration’s Prosecutions of Illegal Immigrant

Kristin Scott Thomas Once Again Shows How Chekhov Is Done