The Threat of Pay-Go
This article is from the archive of The New York Sun before the launch of its new website in 2022. The Sun has neither altered nor updated such articles but will seek to correct any errors, mis-categorizations or other problems introduced during transfer.

Most supply-siders believe that if the Democrats manage to take the House and Senate two and a half weeks from now, President Bush’s investor tax cuts will be safe.
First, the tax cuts already have been extended to 2010. Second, the president will surely veto any tax-hike legislation that a new Democratic Congress might pass. (Think Grover Cleveland, the greatest presidential vetoer in American history.)
Maybe so, but the political story will be more complicated, especially if a Democratic Congress passes new “pay-as-you-go” rules. This could put the tax cuts in jeopardy as early as next year.
There are essentially two kinds of pay-go. One is a spending limitation that was used by the Gingrich Congress to balance the budget in the 1990s.This would be good. The other is a revenue pay-go, which is not so good. In this scenario, if the Democrats cobbled together a big-bang deficit-reduction package, large tax hikes would be put in place to meet the new deficit targets. Since Congress scores the investor tax cuts on dividends and capital gains as static revenue losses — even though the evidence shows they pay for themselves — these tax cuts would be subject to repeal or rollback.
Should revenue pay-go materialize, President Bush might be confronted with having to veto a so-called $500 billion deficit-reduction package that would increase the cap-gain, dividend, and top-income-bracket tax rates.
Truth be told, the Democratic Party desperately wants to return the income-tax rate to President Clinton’s 39.6%. It’s an obsession that’s lodged in the Democratic DNA, a class-warfare mentality that seeks to penalize the rich and soak American success. In practice, it would be a Soviet-style income-leveling exercise in the name of making the non-rich feel better.
And it’s nonsense.
President Bush’s tax cuts have done an amazing job of reigniting the economy. The 2003 tax cuts rallied the stock market, generated 6.5 million new jobs, and produced soaring revenues that have, in turn, slashed the deficit. But all this is in peril if the new pay-go rules go through.
So let me warn my conservative friends and fellow members of the American investor class: A Democratic sweep come November 7 will put Mr. Bush’s hugely successful tax cuts on the chopping block.
It’s a sobering thought, particularly in light of sinking Republican fortunes.
On Tradesports, the online betting parlor, the House GOP 2006 contract has dropped to a new low of 32%. In late September, prior to the Mark Foley scandal, it had been 57%. Bettors, it seems, are giving up on the contract.
On the Senate side, the contract is still a 70% bet the Republicans will hold the upper chamber. This points to a congressional split, meaning Washington will “do no harm” on pro-growth measures, especially tax policy. But it is still possible that a phony pay-go revenue deal could surface with a coalition of House Democrats, liberal Republican senators, and Senate Democrats.
Just as troubling is an anti-growth surge toward protectionist trade activity. The Democrats are against free trade almost uniformly, with 30% to 40% of Republicans considered unreliable on the subject. A recent Wall Street Journal story reveals a strong push for textile protectionism against China, Vietnam, Africa, Haiti, and South America. The supply-side growth model stresses a steady dollar, low tax rates, and free trade to promote growth. Hence, should protectionist legislation trudge forth, it would be an anti-growth lose-lose situation for America and its trading partners.
All this said, the roaring stock market remains very much in favor of a divided Congress. Republican polls are going down, and stocks are going up? Is this the Pelosi bull market? Perhaps so.
But if both chambers shift Democrat, taxes, trade, and spending may all go the wrong way. In the New York Times this week, Robert Pear details Democratic plans to control drug prices and attack health insurers and pharmaceutical companies. It’s Hillarycare all over again — a takeover of 15% of our economy.
President Bush’s economic approval rating has risen 5 points to 44% in a new Wall Street Journal/NBC News poll. Republicans should follow the president’s lead and flog away on the economy, the benefits of lower tax rates, and falling gas prices. They also should loudly trumpet the splendid stock market rally. Indeed, across the next 18 days, this is the GOP’s best chance to generate an enthusiastic voter turnout from the investor class.
Pollster Scott Rasmussen shows that entrepreneurs (49%) and investors (46%) are the two groups most appreciative of the job the president is doing. Message to the GOP: Talk up the low-tax, Goldilocks stock market economy and get these folks to the polls.
It’s your last chance, boys and girls.
Mr. Kudlow is host of CNBC’s “Kudlow & Company.”