The Left’s ‘Zero Carbon’ Flimflam Means Consumers Will Get Clobbered With Soaring Electric Bills

We all want to protect the environment. Yet lefty politicians are making reckless promises to “transition” entirely to renewables — wind and solar — within a few years. Never mind that Joe Public will get clobbered with huge electric bills, blackouts, unaffordable car prices, and layoffs in many industries. Getting to green Nirvana on the left’s timetable will be hell for ordinary people.Some 10 million New Yorkers who rely on Con Edison for their electricity were warned last week that their electric bills are going up 9 percent next month and could double by 2025. A $70 bill will surge to more than $140. Ouch. That could keep you from turning on your air conditioner or clothes dryer.You can thank the state’s Democrats, including Governor Cuomo and Governor Hochul, who are pledging to make Con Edison 100 percent carbon-free and nuclear-free as well. The ruinously expensive transition has to be paid for by Con Edison’s consumers. That’s where much of the $11 billion in rate hike money is going.Worse, expect more rate increases and blackouts ahead because, in New York, wind and solar will fail to produce enough power to meet the public’s needs, according to an energy expert at the nonprofit Power the Future, Daniel Turner. When supply falls short of demand, prices rise.Energy titan Harold Hamm explains in his eye-opening must-read book “Game Changer,” “I’m not against renewables. I am against dismantling the current system for another system that doesn’t exist yet.” Mr. Hamm, founder and chairman of petroleum company Continental Resources, explains that “net zero” has become one of the left’s favorite mantras. Yet “it has zero chance of working.”The costly mistake New York is making is being repeated in other states. The North American Electric Reliability Corporation, a government-certified standard-setting group, cautions that around the country, fossil fuels are being removed from electric grids too fast to meet electrical needs.The Electric Power Research Institute, an industry group, reports that technology does not yet exist to produce an adequate, dependable supply of electricity without carbon.President Biden’s climate ambassador, John Kerry, is being pilloried by the left for admitting that “50 percent of the reductions we have to make to get to net-zero … are going to come from technologies that we don’t yet have.”Politicians cavalierly push for net zero, ignoring these facts.The Pew Research Center finds that two-thirds of Americans want a mix of energy sources, while fewer than one-third think “getting the U.S. to net zero carbon emissions as quickly as possible” is important.Like New York Democrats, Mr. Biden is ignoring the common-sense majority. He vows to end fossil fuel production and use. Last week, Mr. Biden’s Department of Transportation floated radically increased fuel mileage standards, doubling them in less than a decade. The Transportation Secretary, Pete Buttigieg, boasted new standards “means more money in Americans’ pockets” and more energy security for the entire nation. Wrong on both counts.These extreme mileage standards will force automakers to switch to manufacturing primarily electric vehicles, depriving customers of choice and forcing cash-strapped buyers to settle for a clunker instead of a new car.Electric vehicles cost about $53,000.Mr. Biden’s romance with electric vehicles is a gift to Communist China. It controls 85 percent of the metals needed to make EV batteries, according to Mr. Hamm.China is also flooding Europe with cheap EVs, and they could capture 20 percent of the European EV market within the next few years. Mr. Hamm predicts America is next. No wonder the United Auto Workers are stalling endorsing Mr. Biden.Citing heat waves and wildfires, the New York Times alarmists warn against supporting a Republican for president in 2024. The Times claims Republican contenders reject “the scientific consensus” that America “must transition rapidly to renewable energy in order to limit the most catastrophic impacts.”Sorry. There is no scientific consensus on moving to net zero. Industry experts show it would cause severe, self-inflicted hardships.Next time you vote, size up each candidate’s energy IQ. Avoid the ideologues who don’t give a damn whether you can pay your electric bill, afford a new car, or even keep your job. The environment can be protected without destroying America’s standard of living.Creators.com

The Left’s ‘Zero Carbon’ Flimflam Means Consumers Will Get Clobbered With Soaring Electric Bills

More from the New York Sun

The Cloisters Embraces the Ancient Americas, With Uneven Results

Hunter Biden Claims Dad Was Pushed Out of Presidential Race Because He Was Not Part of the ‘Epstein Class’

More from the New York Sun

The Cloisters Embraces the Ancient Americas, With Uneven Results

Hunter Biden Claims Dad Was Pushed Out of Presidential Race Because He Was Not Part of the ‘Epstein Class’

Colbert Marks the End of ‘The Late Show’ With Performance by Paul McCartney, but No Explicit Reference to Trump

The Cultural Significance of Nicki Minaj’s Conservatism

News Aggregators Reinforcing Political Ignorance, Especially for Young Americans

‘Whites-Only’ Community Sued After Rejecting Woman Over Her Jewish Ancestry, Black Husband

Trump’s Tariffs Are Fueling Voters’ Frustration Over Affordability

Newsom Suggests Universal Basic Capital as Solution to AI-Driven Unemployment