Trump Assails Judge in January 6 Case After She Cautioned Him Against Making Inflammatory Remarks

President Trump is assailing the federal judge overseeing the election conspiracy case against him, days after she warned him not to make inflammatory statements about the case.The former president made posts Monday on his social media network calling a federal district court judge, Tanya Chutkan, “highly partisan” and “ VERY BIASED & UNFAIR!” because of her past comments in a separate case overseeing the sentencing of one of the defendants charged in the January 6, 2021, riot at the Capitol.Judge Chutkan in a hearing Friday imposed a protective order in the case limiting what evidence handed over by prosecutors the former president and his legal team can publicly disclose. She warned Mr. Trump’s lawyers that his defense should be mounted in the courtroom and “not on the internet.”Mr. Trump posted about the case online anyway, firing off about the judge.Special counsel Jack Smith declined to comment Monday.Prosecutors sought the protective order after calling attention to another earlier post on Mr. Trump’s social media platform, in which he said he would be “coming after” those who “go after” him. The prosecutors said improper sharing of evidence could have a “harmful chilling effect on witnesses.”Judge Chutkan said that if anyone makes “inflammatory” statements about the case, she would be inclined to move more quickly to trial to prevent any intimidation of witnesses or contamination of the jury pool.Judge Tanya Chutkan. Administrative Office of the U.S. Courts via APThe judge agreed with Trump’s defense team on a looser version of a protective order barring the public release only of materials deemed sensitive, like grand jury material. Yet prosecutors consider most of the evidence in the case to be sensitive, and she largely sided with the government on what will get that label and protections.Protective orders are standard in criminal cases to protect the disclosure of sensitive information that could impact the trial.In his social media post Monday, Trump quoted from remarks Judge Chutkan made in a 2022 sentencing hearing for an Ohio woman, Christine Priola, who pleaded guilty last year to obstructing Congress’ certification of President Biden’s electoral victory — one of the same charges Mr. Trump is facing.“The people who mobbed that Capitol were there in fealty, in loyalty, to one man — not to the Constitution, of which most of the people who come before me seem woefully ignorant; not to the ideals of this country, and not to the principles of democracy,” Judge Chutkan said, according to a transcript of the October 2022 hearing. “It’s a blind loyalty to one person who, by the way, remains free to this day.”Mr. Trump has indicated his legal team will ask Judge Chutkan to recuse herself from the case, which judges are supposed to do when their “impartiality might reasonably be questioned.”Yet a former federal prosecutor, David Weinstein, said Judge Chutkan’s comment won’t help Mr. Trump’s case that he needs a new judge.“I understand why he’s trying to twist her words and use them against her, but I don’t think it crosses the line,” said Mr. Weinstein, now a white collar criminal defense attorney.Mr. Weinstein said Trump appears to be trying to “egg her on into doing something that’s going to give him the grounds to file a motion to recuse.”“She has to careful not to take the bait,” he said.Prosecutors with the special counsel’s team have asked the judge to set a January 2 trial date, which is less than two weeks before Iowa’s first-in-the-nation caucuses. That prompted other angry posts online from Mr. Trump last week.Mr. Trump and his lawyers claimed prosecutors’ proposed protective order that sought to prevent the public release of all evidence they provide the defense would violate his First Amendment rights of free speech. The Republican has vowed to keep talking about the case— and his other legal challenges —as he campaigns again for the White House.Mr. Trump spoke about the case while he was campaigning at the Iowa State Fair over the weekend, declining to tell reporters whether he would comply with the protective order. He said, “The whole thing is a fake — it was put out by Biden, because they can’t win an election the fair way.”Mr. Trump, in another post Monday, wrote of Chutkan: “She obviously wants me behind bars. VERY BIASED & UNFAIR”.Judge Chutkan, a former assistant public defender who was nominated to the bench by President Obama, was confirmed to the bench with Republican support in a 95-0 vote in the Senate in 2014.She has been one of the toughest punishers of rioters who stormed the Capitol. Federal judges in Washington have sentenced nearly 600 defendants for their roles in the attack, which was fueled by Mr. Trump’s claims that the 2020 presidential election was stolen by fraud.The case cited in Mr. Trump’s post, however, is one where Chutkan actually imposed a sentence that was lighter than prosecutors sought. She sentenced Priola to 15 months in prison. Federal prosecutors had asked for 18 months.Associated Press

Trump Assails Judge in January 6 Case After She Cautioned Him Against Making Inflammatory Remarks

More from the New York Sun

Electricity Prices Have Surged 18 Percent Since Trump Took Office Despite His Promise to Cut Them in Half

The New 5-A-Day? Heart Docs Say Up to Five Coffees Is Fine

As War Intensifies, Iran Steels the Houthis, Hezbollah, and Hamas

More from the New York Sun

Electricity Prices Have Surged 18 Percent Since Trump Took Office Despite His Promise to Cut Them in Half

The New 5-A-Day? Heart Docs Say Up to Five Coffees Is Fine

As War Intensifies, Iran Steels the Houthis, Hezbollah, and Hamas

A Legal Victory for ‘America’s Rifle’

Date Set for Trump’s Bid To Resurrect Troubled Prosecutions Against James Comey and Letitia James

Britain’s New Prime Minister Promises the Panacea of a ‘Ten-Year Plan’ That Would Move the Country to the Left

FDA Says False-Positive Test Doesn’t Clear Taylor Farms Lettuce as Source of Cyclospora Outbreak

Federal Judge Temporarily Blocks Paramount-Warner Bros. Merger