Trump’s Tax-Code Gimmickry Puts Progressive Social Engineering Ahead of Pro-Growth Reform

If you voted for President Trump last November because you believed he’d increase economic freedom, it’s safe to say you were fooled. Following a reckless tariff barrage, the White House and its allies are preparing a new wave of tax-code gimmickry that has more in common with progressive social engineering than pro-growth reform. And don’t forget a fiscal recklessness that mirrors the mistakes of the left.Defend these policies if you like, but let’s be clear: The administration shows no coherent commitment to free-market principles and is in fact actively undermining them. Its approach is better described as central planning disguised as economic nationalism.This week’s example is an executive-order attempt at prescription drug price control, similar to Democrats’ past proposals. If implemented, it would inevitably reduce pharmaceutical research, development and innovation.Tariffs remain the administration’s most visible economic sin after Trump launched the most extreme escalation of protectionism since the infamous Smoot-Hawley Tariff Act of 1930. Unlike the 1930s economy, however, today’s economy is deeply integrated with global supply chains, making the damage extensive and far more immediate. Tariffs are only nominally imposed on imports. Ultimately, they’re taxes on American consumers, workers and businesses.The president has made it clear that he’s fine with limiting consumer choice, blithely telling parents they might have to “settle” for two dolls instead of 30 for their children. Smug pronouncements about how much we should shop (not much) or which sectors we should work in (manufacturing) are economic authoritarianism.They’re also indicative of a deeper government rot. Policymaking is now done by executive orders as comatose congressional Republicans, like some Biden-era Democrats, allow the president to rule as if he’s a monarch.A full-throated, assertive Congress would remind any president that manufacturing jobs were mostly lost to technologies that also create jobs and opportunity in members’ districts. Prosperity increases only through innovation and competition and isn’t restored by dragging people backward into lower-productivity jobs.Now, even Mr. Trump’s tax agenda — once considered a bright spot by many free-market advocates — is being corrupted. Instead of championing the broad-based, pro-growth reforms we’d hoped for, the administration is doubling down on gimmickry: exempting tips and overtime pay, expanding child tax credits and entertaining the idea of raising top marginal tax rates.These moves might poll well, but they’re unprincipled and unproductive. They undermine the 2017 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, which aimed (however imperfectly) to simplify the code and incentivize growth, and not to micromanage worker and household behavior through the IRS.And then there are the administration’s misleading, populist talking points about raising taxes on the rich to reduce taxes on lower and middle-income workers. The American income tax system is already one of the most progressive in the developed world. According to the latest IRS data, the top 1 percent of earners pay more in federal income taxes than the bottom 90 percent combined. These high earners provide 40 percent of federal income tax revenue; the bottom half of earners make up only 3 percent of that revenue. Thankfully, the House of Representatives steered away from that mistake in its bill.Meanwhile, some Republican legislators are pushing to extend the 2017 tax cuts without meaningful offsets, setting the stage for a debt-fueled disaster. As noted by the former longtime president of the Tax Foundation, Scott Hodge, the GOP’s proposed cuts could add more than $5.8 trillion to the debt over a decade. That’s nearly three times the cost of the 2021 American Rescue Plan, which many Republicans rightly criticized for fueling inflation and fiscal instability.To be clear: Pro-growth tax reform is essential. But not every tax cut is pro-growth, and no tax cut justifies further fiscal deterioration. Extending the 2017 cuts, which I generally support, shouldn’t be confused with true tax reform.Some of the provisions being floated — expanded credits, exclusions for tips and overtime, rolling back the state and local tax deduction cap — are not growth policies. They are wealth redistribution run through the tax code, indistinguishable in substance from the kind of demand-side, Keynesian stimulus Republicans once decried.Hodge notes that these measures would do more to mimic the American Rescue Plan than to reverse its pricey mistakes. And with the Federal Reserve still fighting inflation, adding trillions in unfunded liabilities to the national ledger is profoundly irresponsible.None of this should surprise anyone paying attention. This administration is packed with advisers and surrogates who glorify union power, rail against globalization and scoff at the very idea of limited government.Some sound more like Bernie Sanders than Milton Friedman. Whether it’s directing industrial policy or distorting the tax code to reward their favorite behaviors, they are hostile to the competition and liberty of the free market.Sadly, that hostility has real consequences: higher prices, greater economic uncertainty, sluggish investment and fewer opportunities for middle- and lower-class families.Creators.com

Trump’s Tax-Code Gimmickry Puts Progressive Social Engineering Ahead of Pro-Growth Reform

Trump’s Tax-Code Gimmickry Puts Progressive Social Engineering Ahead of Pro-Growth Reform

More from the New York Sun

Watching K-Pop Can Get You Killed in North Korea, and It May Be About To Get Worse

One in Five Germans Is Now an Immigrant. The Crime Numbers Are Impossible To Ignore

Pakistan Is Selling Billions in Weapons Across Africa. Washington Should Be Paying Attention

The Strange Word Charles III Uses To Describe the Death of ‘Much-Loved Kinsman,’ King Harald V of Norway

Rogue OpenAI Models Tried To Cover Their Tracks in Hugging Face Attack

Child Brides, Grown Men: Why Won’t the UN Call ‘Child Marriage’ What It Is?

Five Years After Kabul Fell, Afghanistan Doesn’t Register on America’s National Security Radar

What AOC Didn’t Tell Us About Her Odds of Success From Freezing Her Eggs

More from the New York Sun

Watching K-Pop Can Get You Killed in North Korea, and It May Be About To Get Worse

One in Five Germans Is Now an Immigrant. The Crime Numbers Are Impossible To Ignore

Pakistan Is Selling Billions in Weapons Across Africa. Washington Should Be Paying Attention

The Strange Word Charles III Uses To Describe the Death of ‘Much-Loved Kinsman,’ King Harald V of Norway

Rogue OpenAI Models Tried To Cover Their Tracks in Hugging Face Attack

Child Brides, Grown Men: Why Won’t the UN Call ‘Child Marriage’ What It Is?

Five Years After Kabul Fell, Afghanistan Doesn’t Register on America’s National Security Radar

What AOC Didn’t Tell Us About Her Odds of Success From Freezing Her Eggs